Wireline Formation Tester Multi-Probe and Packer-Probe Pressure Transient Tests in Dry Gas Reservoirs

C. Alan
{"title":"Wireline Formation Tester Multi-Probe and Packer-Probe Pressure Transient Tests in Dry Gas Reservoirs","authors":"C. Alan","doi":"10.2118/215576-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Most of interpretation and analysis procedures developed for pressure transients acquired by multi-probe and packer-probe wireline formation testers (WFTs) are used to conduct are based on the slightly compressible fluid of constant viscosity and compressibility. Hence, these interpretation and analysis procedures apply for oil and water bearing formations. There is a concern that the interpretation/analysis methods based on the assumption of slightly compressible fluid may not be applicable in the case of testing a single-layer or a multi-layer gas zone(s) with the effects of nonlinear gas properties including non-Darcy flow for multi-probe or packer-probe wireline formation testers. In the literature, to the best of our knowledge, there is no a comprehensive study investigating the validity of the above stated assumption for the interpretation of WFT pressure transient data in gas zones.\n In this work, variety of cases considered for investigating the effect (or sensitivity) of non-linear gas flow on the pressure transients from multi-probe and packer-probe wireline formation testers (WFTs). These effects include gas gravity, variation of gas viscosity and compressibility with pressure, non-Darcy flow, position of active (flowing) and observation probes, mechanical skin and radius of skin (or invaded) zone, and reservoir heterogeneity in the vertical direction. A three-dimensional r-θ-z single-phase-gas fully-implicit finite-difference model for a limited-entry vertical well has been developed for the purpose of this investigation. The results show that for multi-probe wireline testers, the sink (or the flowing) and horizontal probe pressure responses are highly affected by the effects of the non-Darcy flow and invaded zone, while the vertical probe pressures are mainly influenced by the properties of the uninvaded zones with non significant non-Darcy flow effect. For packer-probe testers, similar results are obtained. Both synthetic cases are presented to confirm the theory and procedures developed in this work.","PeriodicalId":178397,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Fri, September 08, 2023","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Fri, September 08, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/215576-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most of interpretation and analysis procedures developed for pressure transients acquired by multi-probe and packer-probe wireline formation testers (WFTs) are used to conduct are based on the slightly compressible fluid of constant viscosity and compressibility. Hence, these interpretation and analysis procedures apply for oil and water bearing formations. There is a concern that the interpretation/analysis methods based on the assumption of slightly compressible fluid may not be applicable in the case of testing a single-layer or a multi-layer gas zone(s) with the effects of nonlinear gas properties including non-Darcy flow for multi-probe or packer-probe wireline formation testers. In the literature, to the best of our knowledge, there is no a comprehensive study investigating the validity of the above stated assumption for the interpretation of WFT pressure transient data in gas zones. In this work, variety of cases considered for investigating the effect (or sensitivity) of non-linear gas flow on the pressure transients from multi-probe and packer-probe wireline formation testers (WFTs). These effects include gas gravity, variation of gas viscosity and compressibility with pressure, non-Darcy flow, position of active (flowing) and observation probes, mechanical skin and radius of skin (or invaded) zone, and reservoir heterogeneity in the vertical direction. A three-dimensional r-θ-z single-phase-gas fully-implicit finite-difference model for a limited-entry vertical well has been developed for the purpose of this investigation. The results show that for multi-probe wireline testers, the sink (or the flowing) and horizontal probe pressure responses are highly affected by the effects of the non-Darcy flow and invaded zone, while the vertical probe pressures are mainly influenced by the properties of the uninvaded zones with non significant non-Darcy flow effect. For packer-probe testers, similar results are obtained. Both synthetic cases are presented to confirm the theory and procedures developed in this work.
干气储层电缆地层测试仪多探头和封隔器探头压力瞬态测试
针对多探头和封隔器探头电缆地层测试仪(WFTs)获取的压力瞬态数据,大多数解释和分析方法都是基于粘度和可压缩性不变的微可压缩流体。因此,这些解释和分析程序适用于含油和含水地层。人们担心,基于流体可压缩性假设的解释/分析方法可能不适用于多层或单层含气层的非线性气体特性测试,包括多探头或封隔器探头电缆地层测试器的非达西流动。在文献中,据我们所知,还没有一项全面的研究调查上述假设对解释含气区WFT压力瞬态数据的有效性。在这项工作中,考虑了多种情况,以研究非线性气体流动对多探头和封隔器探头电缆地层测试器(WFTs)压力瞬态的影响(或灵敏度)。这些影响包括气体重力、气体粘度和可压缩性随压力的变化、非达西流动、活动(流动)和观测探头的位置、机械表皮和表皮(或侵入)带半径、垂向储层非均质性等。为此,建立了有限入口直井的三维r-θ-z单相气全隐式有限差分模型。结果表明,对于多探头电缆测试仪,下沉(或流动)和水平探头压力响应受非达西流动和侵入区影响较大,而垂直探头压力主要受非达西流动影响不显著的非侵入区特性的影响。对于封隔器探针测试仪,也得到了类似的结果。这两个综合的情况下,提出了证实理论和程序发展在这项工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信