Clinical Outcomes and Finite Element Method Results of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using H-Beam Shaped Allospacer: A Comparison with Rim-Shaped Allospacer
Kyoung Jae Park, Dae Hwan Kim, K. Park, J. Park, N. Yoo, K. Cho, Sang Hyun Kim
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes and Finite Element Method Results of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using H-Beam Shaped Allospacer: A Comparison with Rim-Shaped Allospacer","authors":"Kyoung Jae Park, Dae Hwan Kim, K. Park, J. Park, N. Yoo, K. Cho, Sang Hyun Kim","doi":"10.21129/nerve.2019.5.2.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corresponding author: Sang Hyun Kim Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea Tel: +82-31-219-5230 Fax: +82-31-219-5238 E-mail: kaliemd@naver.com Objective: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate radiologic outcomes and Finite element method (FEM) results of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using H-beam shaped allospacer, in comparison with rim-shaped allospacer. Methods: From March 2011 to February 2014, 95 patients underwent ACDF using allospacers (H-beam shaped and rim shaped). Sixty-two patients were divided into 2 groups: Hbeam shaped allospacer in group A (n=31); rim shaped allospacer in group B (n=31). We retrospectively estimated clinical outcomes, such as, neck and arm pain, radiographic fusion rate and adverse effects. In the FEM study, we compared the performance of 3 different shaped allospacer; i.e., H-beam shaped, H-hole shaped, rim-shaped. We tested the effectiveness of stress distribution from the 3 types of allospacer, using the evaluation criteria of (a) compression; (b) shear; and (c) torsion, under the same load. Results: Neck and arm pain was reduced similarly by 63% to 73% in 2 groups. Fusion rates after 1 year in group A and B were 100% and 98% retrospectively. The complication rates of breakage and displacement in Group B were 16% and 3%. Group A show no adverse effects. From the FEM study, in the cases of the (a), (b), (c), we found that H-beam shaped allospacer resulted in effectiveness stress distribution and diversification regarding compression, shear and torsion compared with rim shaped allospacer. Conclusion: In ACDF using allospacer, H-beam shaped allospacer shows more stable fusion rates with low incidence of complication compared with rim shaped allospacer.","PeriodicalId":229172,"journal":{"name":"The Nerve","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Nerve","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21129/nerve.2019.5.2.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Corresponding author: Sang Hyun Kim Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea Tel: +82-31-219-5230 Fax: +82-31-219-5238 E-mail: kaliemd@naver.com Objective: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate radiologic outcomes and Finite element method (FEM) results of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using H-beam shaped allospacer, in comparison with rim-shaped allospacer. Methods: From March 2011 to February 2014, 95 patients underwent ACDF using allospacers (H-beam shaped and rim shaped). Sixty-two patients were divided into 2 groups: Hbeam shaped allospacer in group A (n=31); rim shaped allospacer in group B (n=31). We retrospectively estimated clinical outcomes, such as, neck and arm pain, radiographic fusion rate and adverse effects. In the FEM study, we compared the performance of 3 different shaped allospacer; i.e., H-beam shaped, H-hole shaped, rim-shaped. We tested the effectiveness of stress distribution from the 3 types of allospacer, using the evaluation criteria of (a) compression; (b) shear; and (c) torsion, under the same load. Results: Neck and arm pain was reduced similarly by 63% to 73% in 2 groups. Fusion rates after 1 year in group A and B were 100% and 98% retrospectively. The complication rates of breakage and displacement in Group B were 16% and 3%. Group A show no adverse effects. From the FEM study, in the cases of the (a), (b), (c), we found that H-beam shaped allospacer resulted in effectiveness stress distribution and diversification regarding compression, shear and torsion compared with rim shaped allospacer. Conclusion: In ACDF using allospacer, H-beam shaped allospacer shows more stable fusion rates with low incidence of complication compared with rim shaped allospacer.