{"title":"Charles Dickens","authors":"Andrew N. Mangham","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198850038.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter illustrates how Charles Dickens found the materiality of starvation a powerful method for addressing the social injustices that angered him. Less balanced than Gaskell and less conflicted than Kingsley, he pulled no punches when it came to the ‘Parrots of Society’—those subscribers to hypocritical, dogmatic interpretations of political economy whose efforts to deal with social problems became, he believed, abortive subscriptions to a malicious laissez faire. The chapter argues that we need to understand these red-hot polemics as a response to, and an appropriation of, the scientific registers of men like Thomas Southwood Smith. What Dickens found in science was a materialism that allowed his challenges to the shallow cant of reformers and politicians to morph into an attack on their perceived stupidity: Dickens was able to use the science of starving as a means of grounding a radical position within a thoughtful materialist one.","PeriodicalId":261186,"journal":{"name":"The Science of Starving in Victorian Literature, Medicine, and Political Economy","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Science of Starving in Victorian Literature, Medicine, and Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198850038.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This chapter illustrates how Charles Dickens found the materiality of starvation a powerful method for addressing the social injustices that angered him. Less balanced than Gaskell and less conflicted than Kingsley, he pulled no punches when it came to the ‘Parrots of Society’—those subscribers to hypocritical, dogmatic interpretations of political economy whose efforts to deal with social problems became, he believed, abortive subscriptions to a malicious laissez faire. The chapter argues that we need to understand these red-hot polemics as a response to, and an appropriation of, the scientific registers of men like Thomas Southwood Smith. What Dickens found in science was a materialism that allowed his challenges to the shallow cant of reformers and politicians to morph into an attack on their perceived stupidity: Dickens was able to use the science of starving as a means of grounding a radical position within a thoughtful materialist one.
这一章阐述了查尔斯·狄更斯如何发现饥饿的物质性是解决令他愤怒的社会不公的有力方法。他不像盖斯凯尔那么平衡,也不像金斯利那么矛盾,所以在“社会的鹦鹉”(parrot of Society)一书中,他毫不客气。他认为,这些人对政治经济学虚伪、教条的解释的订阅者,处理社会问题的努力变成了对恶意自由放任的失败订阅。这一章认为,我们需要把这些火热的论战理解为对托马斯·索斯伍德·史密斯等人的科学记录的回应和盗用。狄更斯在科学中发现的是一种唯物主义,这种唯物主义使他对改革者和政治家肤浅的伪善的挑战转变为对他们所认为的愚蠢的攻击:狄更斯能够利用饥饿科学作为一种手段,将一个激进的立场根植于一个深思熟虑的唯物主义立场。