“A Wonderful Movie!”: The Appropriation of Entertainment Ultrasound Technology in The Netherlands

Roos Metselaar
{"title":"“A Wonderful Movie!”: The Appropriation of Entertainment Ultrasound Technology in The Netherlands","authors":"Roos Metselaar","doi":"10.15273/jue.v12i2.11408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is now almost impossible to imagine a pregnancy in The Netherlands without one or two fetal ultrasounds. In contrast to the biomedical view of seeing ultrasound technology as a transparent window into the womb, much scholarly research in the social sciences highlights that the technology is not neutral, but has different meanings and applications depending on the context. Feminist anthropologists have mostly criticized ultrasound technology for invading the intimate experience of pregnancy and making women “invisible.” This article focuses on socalled “entertainment” ultrasounds to explore how pregnant women in The Netherlands use ultrasound technology for new, unintended purposes. Using semi-structured interviews and discourse analysis of websites of commercial ultrasound clinics, I demonstrate that many pregnant women in The Netherlands consider the ultrasound scan a positive and valuable experience that they can consciously use to feel less insecure and to relax during their pregnancy. It is argued that, in looking so closely at the structural power relations that limit women’s agency, feminist anthropologists often downplay the possible leeway that expectant mothers have. These women are not forced into doing “entertainment” ultrasound scans but are active agents appropriating the technology.","PeriodicalId":298867,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Undergraduate Ethnography","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Undergraduate Ethnography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15273/jue.v12i2.11408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is now almost impossible to imagine a pregnancy in The Netherlands without one or two fetal ultrasounds. In contrast to the biomedical view of seeing ultrasound technology as a transparent window into the womb, much scholarly research in the social sciences highlights that the technology is not neutral, but has different meanings and applications depending on the context. Feminist anthropologists have mostly criticized ultrasound technology for invading the intimate experience of pregnancy and making women “invisible.” This article focuses on socalled “entertainment” ultrasounds to explore how pregnant women in The Netherlands use ultrasound technology for new, unintended purposes. Using semi-structured interviews and discourse analysis of websites of commercial ultrasound clinics, I demonstrate that many pregnant women in The Netherlands consider the ultrasound scan a positive and valuable experience that they can consciously use to feel less insecure and to relax during their pregnancy. It is argued that, in looking so closely at the structural power relations that limit women’s agency, feminist anthropologists often downplay the possible leeway that expectant mothers have. These women are not forced into doing “entertainment” ultrasound scans but are active agents appropriating the technology.
“一部精彩的电影!”:荷兰娱乐超声技术的挪用
现在,在荷兰,如果没有一两次胎儿超声波检查,几乎无法想象怀孕。与将超声波技术视为子宫内的透明窗口的生物医学观点相反,社会科学领域的许多学术研究强调,这项技术不是中立的,而是根据不同的背景具有不同的含义和应用。女权主义人类学家大多批评超声波技术侵犯了怀孕的亲密体验,使女性“隐形”。这篇文章的重点是所谓的“娱乐”超声波,以探索荷兰的孕妇如何将超声波技术用于新的,意想不到的目的。通过对商业超声波诊所网站的半结构化访谈和话语分析,我证明了荷兰的许多孕妇认为超声波扫描是一种积极而宝贵的体验,她们可以有意识地利用超声波扫描来减少怀孕期间的不安全感和放松。有人认为,在如此仔细地研究限制女性能动性的结构性权力关系时,女权主义人类学家往往低估了准妈妈们可能拥有的回旋余地。这些女性并不是被迫做“娱乐”超声波扫描,而是积极利用这项技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信