A Comparison of Two Database Partitioning Approaches that Support Taxonomy-Based Query Answering

J. Schäfer, L. Wiese
{"title":"A Comparison of Two Database Partitioning Approaches that Support Taxonomy-Based Query Answering","authors":"J. Schäfer, L. Wiese","doi":"10.1145/3428757.3429108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we address the topic of identification of cohorts of similar patients in a database of electronic health records. We follow the conjecture that retrieval of similar patients can be supported by an underlying distributed database design. Hence we propose a fragmentation based on partitioning the health records and present a benchmark of two implementation variants in comparison to an off-the-shelf data distribution approach provided by Apache Ignite. While our main use case in this paper is cohort identification, our approach has advantages for taxonomy-based query answering in other (non-medical) domains.","PeriodicalId":212557,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3428757.3429108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper we address the topic of identification of cohorts of similar patients in a database of electronic health records. We follow the conjecture that retrieval of similar patients can be supported by an underlying distributed database design. Hence we propose a fragmentation based on partitioning the health records and present a benchmark of two implementation variants in comparison to an off-the-shelf data distribution approach provided by Apache Ignite. While our main use case in this paper is cohort identification, our approach has advantages for taxonomy-based query answering in other (non-medical) domains.
支持基于分类的查询应答的两种数据库分区方法的比较
在本文中,我们讨论了在电子健康记录数据库中识别相似患者队列的主题。我们遵循这样的猜想:类似患者的检索可以通过底层分布式数据库设计来支持。因此,我们提出了一种基于健康记录分区的碎片化方法,并提供了两种实现变体的基准测试,与Apache Ignite提供的现成数据分发方法进行比较。虽然我们在本文中的主要用例是队列识别,但我们的方法在其他(非医疗)领域具有基于分类法的查询应答的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信