Teachers’ Reflection and Level of Reflective Thinking on the Different Dimensions of their teaching practice

Şenol Orakcı
{"title":"Teachers’ Reflection and Level of Reflective Thinking on the Different Dimensions of their teaching practice","authors":"Şenol Orakcı","doi":"10.51383/IJONMES.2021.88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aimed to deeply evaluate English teachers' reflective thinking skills and levels with regard to the dimension of learning objectives, content, learning-teaching process, and measurement and evaluation in the context of English course. The study was designed as case study method. The study group was composed of 27 teachers selected based on the criterion sampling method. With regard to data analysis, descriptive analysis technique was used. In the study, it was determined that based on their reflective diaries, participant teachers reflected at the technical, practical and critical levels and developed reflection-in-action, reflection-on-action, and reflection-for-action. Results showed that the participant teachers had information about reflective thinking skills and they made some changes in the lesson plan because they thought that a lesson plan for the learning objectives ignoring students' prior knowledge was ineffective. Based on teachers’ opinions, it was also determined that the content consisted of similar topics and was very intense and heavily based on vocabulary teaching. Results indicated that participant teachers reflected on teaching methods and techniques, activities and materials, student motivation, classroom atmosphere, and ensuring participation in the lesson. It was also revealed that the efficiency of measurement tools and the need to prepare measurement tools with regard to the learning objectives should be realized. Providing teachers with in-service training courses such as thinking skills, problem solving and decision making techniques, risk and crisis management that will contribute to overcoming their shortcoming and mistakes is thought to improve their reflective thinking skills.","PeriodicalId":151861,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Modern Education Studies","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Modern Education Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51383/IJONMES.2021.88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The present study aimed to deeply evaluate English teachers' reflective thinking skills and levels with regard to the dimension of learning objectives, content, learning-teaching process, and measurement and evaluation in the context of English course. The study was designed as case study method. The study group was composed of 27 teachers selected based on the criterion sampling method. With regard to data analysis, descriptive analysis technique was used. In the study, it was determined that based on their reflective diaries, participant teachers reflected at the technical, practical and critical levels and developed reflection-in-action, reflection-on-action, and reflection-for-action. Results showed that the participant teachers had information about reflective thinking skills and they made some changes in the lesson plan because they thought that a lesson plan for the learning objectives ignoring students' prior knowledge was ineffective. Based on teachers’ opinions, it was also determined that the content consisted of similar topics and was very intense and heavily based on vocabulary teaching. Results indicated that participant teachers reflected on teaching methods and techniques, activities and materials, student motivation, classroom atmosphere, and ensuring participation in the lesson. It was also revealed that the efficiency of measurement tools and the need to prepare measurement tools with regard to the learning objectives should be realized. Providing teachers with in-service training courses such as thinking skills, problem solving and decision making techniques, risk and crisis management that will contribute to overcoming their shortcoming and mistakes is thought to improve their reflective thinking skills.
教师在教学实践中不同维度的反思与反思水平
本研究旨在以英语课程为背景,从学习目标、学习内容、学与教过程、测量与评价等维度,深入评价英语教师的反思性思维技能与水平。本研究采用个案研究法。采用标准抽样法抽取27名教师作为研究对象。在数据分析方面,采用描述性分析技术。在研究中,根据他们的反思日记,参与者教师在技术、实践和关键层面进行反思,并发展了行动中的反思、行动中的反思和行动中的反思。结果表明,参与教师对反思性思维技能有一定的了解,他们认为忽视学生先验知识的学习目标教案是无效的,因此对教案进行了一些修改。根据教师的意见,也确定了内容由相似的主题组成,并且非常激烈,并且以词汇教学为主。结果显示,参与教师在教学方法与技巧、活动与教材、学生动机、课堂氛围、确保课堂参与等方面进行了反思。会议还指出,应认识到测量工具的效率以及编制与学习目标有关的测量工具的必要性。为教师提供思考技能、解决问题和决策技巧、风险和危机管理等在职培训课程,有助于他们克服缺点和错误,提高他们的反思思维能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信