Jēdzienu “iekšējais pamatojums” un “ārējais pamatojums” jēga

Jānis Musts
{"title":"Jēdzienu “iekšējais pamatojums” un “ārējais pamatojums” jēga","authors":"Jānis Musts","doi":"10.22364/juzk.80.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The terms “internal justification” and “external justification” are often used to analyse the justification of legal decisions. The aim of this research paper is to identify and critically analyse different notions of “internal justification” and “external justification” in order to improve them. The author rejects the notion of “internal justification” and “external justification” offered by Jerzy Wróblewski and the thesis that the role of internal justification is to test the validity of arguments. The author demonstrates that the notions of “internal justification” and “external justification” used by Robert Alexy are mutually contradictory and offers ways to avoid this contradiction.","PeriodicalId":413617,"journal":{"name":"Latvijas Republikas Satversmei – 100","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latvijas Republikas Satversmei – 100","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.80.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The terms “internal justification” and “external justification” are often used to analyse the justification of legal decisions. The aim of this research paper is to identify and critically analyse different notions of “internal justification” and “external justification” in order to improve them. The author rejects the notion of “internal justification” and “external justification” offered by Jerzy Wróblewski and the thesis that the role of internal justification is to test the validity of arguments. The author demonstrates that the notions of “internal justification” and “external justification” used by Robert Alexy are mutually contradictory and offers ways to avoid this contradiction.
“内部正当理由”和“外部正当理由”这两个术语常用于分析法律决定的正当理由。本研究论文的目的是识别和批判性地分析“内部论证”和“外部论证”的不同概念,以改进它们。作者反对Jerzy Wróblewski提出的“内部证明”和“外部证明”的概念,以及内部证明的作用是检验论点有效性的论点。作者论证了罗伯特·阿列克谢使用的“内部辩护”和“外部辩护”概念是相互矛盾的,并提出了避免这种矛盾的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信