Separating durability and availability in self-managed storage

EW 11 Pub Date : 2004-09-19 DOI:10.1145/1133572.1133576
Geoffrey Lefebvre, M. Feeley
{"title":"Separating durability and availability in self-managed storage","authors":"Geoffrey Lefebvre, M. Feeley","doi":"10.1145/1133572.1133576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building reliable data storage from unreliable components presents many challenges and is of particular interest for peer-to-peer storage systems. Recent work has examined the trade-offs associated with ensuring data availability in such systems. Reliability, however, is more than just availability. In fact, the durability of data is typically of more paramount concern. While users are likely to tolerate occasional disconnection from their data (they will likely have no choice in the matter), they demand a much stronger guarantee that their data is never permanently lost due to failure. To deliver strong durability guarantees efficiently, however, requires decoupling durability from availability. This paper describes the design of a data redundancy scheme that guarantees durability independently from availability. We provide a formula for determining the rate of redundancy repair when durability is the only concern and show that availability requires much more frequent repair. We simulate modified versions of the Total Recall block store that incorporate our design. Our results show that we can deliver durability more cheaply than availability, reducing network overhead by between 50% and 97%.","PeriodicalId":285758,"journal":{"name":"EW 11","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EW 11","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1133572.1133576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Building reliable data storage from unreliable components presents many challenges and is of particular interest for peer-to-peer storage systems. Recent work has examined the trade-offs associated with ensuring data availability in such systems. Reliability, however, is more than just availability. In fact, the durability of data is typically of more paramount concern. While users are likely to tolerate occasional disconnection from their data (they will likely have no choice in the matter), they demand a much stronger guarantee that their data is never permanently lost due to failure. To deliver strong durability guarantees efficiently, however, requires decoupling durability from availability. This paper describes the design of a data redundancy scheme that guarantees durability independently from availability. We provide a formula for determining the rate of redundancy repair when durability is the only concern and show that availability requires much more frequent repair. We simulate modified versions of the Total Recall block store that incorporate our design. Our results show that we can deliver durability more cheaply than availability, reducing network overhead by between 50% and 97%.
在自管理存储中分离持久性和可用性
从不可靠的组件构建可靠的数据存储提出了许多挑战,这对于点对点存储系统来说尤其重要。最近的工作审查了与确保此类系统中的数据可用性有关的权衡。然而,可靠性不仅仅是可用性。实际上,数据的持久性通常是最重要的问题。虽然用户可能会容忍偶尔与他们的数据断开连接(他们在这件事上可能别无选择),但他们需要更强有力的保证,即他们的数据永远不会因故障而永久丢失。然而,为了有效地提供强大的持久性保证,需要将持久性与可用性解耦。本文描述了一种数据冗余方案的设计,该方案保证了持久性而不依赖于可用性。我们提供了一个公式,用于确定当耐久性是唯一关注的冗余修复率,并表明可用性需要更频繁的修复。我们模拟了包含我们设计的Total Recall块存储的修改版本。我们的结果表明,我们可以以比可用性更低的成本提供持久性,将网络开销减少50%到97%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信