13. Exclusion from asylum

G. Clayton, G. Firth, C. Sawyer, R. Moffatt, H. Wray
{"title":"13. Exclusion from asylum","authors":"G. Clayton, G. Firth, C. Sawyer, R. Moffatt, H. Wray","doi":"10.1093/HE/9780198747550.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter considers the provisions whereby an individual can be excluded from refugee status because of their conduct. These are as laid down in the Refugee Convention and the EC Qualification Directive. These powers were little used in the twentieth century, but now are used increasingly often in the context of the escalation in international action against terrorism. Their interpretation and application are affected by domestic legislation, in the UK, the Nationality Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, the Immigration Asylum and Nationality Act 2006, and the Terrorism Acts of 2000 and 2006, and draw on international criminal law. The chapter discusses up-to-date case law on exclusion from refugee status based on crimes against humanity, serious non-political crimes, and acts against the purpose and principles of the United Nations. It deals with the issue of complicity and the relationship with the UK’s anti-terrorism legislation. It also deals with the situations in which refugees can be removed from the host country.","PeriodicalId":152948,"journal":{"name":"Immigration & Asylum Law","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immigration & Asylum Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/HE/9780198747550.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter considers the provisions whereby an individual can be excluded from refugee status because of their conduct. These are as laid down in the Refugee Convention and the EC Qualification Directive. These powers were little used in the twentieth century, but now are used increasingly often in the context of the escalation in international action against terrorism. Their interpretation and application are affected by domestic legislation, in the UK, the Nationality Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, the Immigration Asylum and Nationality Act 2006, and the Terrorism Acts of 2000 and 2006, and draw on international criminal law. The chapter discusses up-to-date case law on exclusion from refugee status based on crimes against humanity, serious non-political crimes, and acts against the purpose and principles of the United Nations. It deals with the issue of complicity and the relationship with the UK’s anti-terrorism legislation. It also deals with the situations in which refugees can be removed from the host country.
13. 不受庇护
本章审议了个人可因其行为而被排除在难民地位之外的规定。这些是《难民公约》和《欧共体资格指令》所规定的。这些权力在20世纪很少使用,但现在越来越多地在国际反恐行动升级的背景下使用。他们的解释和适用受到国内立法的影响,在英国,2002年的《国籍移民和庇护法》,2006年的《移民庇护和国籍法》,2000年和2006年的《恐怖主义法》,并借鉴了国际刑法。本章讨论了基于危害人类罪、严重非政治性罪行和违反联合国宗旨和原则的行为而排除难民地位的最新判例法。它涉及共谋问题以及与英国反恐立法的关系。它还处理难民可以从东道国被驱逐的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信