Publiskas personas tiesības uz savu attēlu preses brīvības kontekstā

Agris Bitāns
{"title":"Publiskas personas tiesības uz savu attēlu preses brīvības kontekstā","authors":"Agris Bitāns","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is dedicated to the scope of protection of the right of public figure to its own image in conjunction with the freedom of press. Since the approaches to the matter in hand differ not only between US and Europe, but also amongst the EU countries, there is systemic inconsistency regarding the right of publicity (publicity right) and the right to personality (personality right). Latvia needs to introduce appropriate legal term analogical to publicity right, which describes the right of an individual be protected against unauthorised use of person’s likeness (photo or video) with a commercial or an otherwise public purpose. Despite the fact that public figures have less protection from press, it is very important to establish proper balance between public interests and private interests, since an individual, even if he or she is a public figure, does not forfeit all the privacy or individual protection.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the scope of protection of the right of public figure to its own image in conjunction with the freedom of press. Since the approaches to the matter in hand differ not only between US and Europe, but also amongst the EU countries, there is systemic inconsistency regarding the right of publicity (publicity right) and the right to personality (personality right). Latvia needs to introduce appropriate legal term analogical to publicity right, which describes the right of an individual be protected against unauthorised use of person’s likeness (photo or video) with a commercial or an otherwise public purpose. Despite the fact that public figures have less protection from press, it is very important to establish proper balance between public interests and private interests, since an individual, even if he or she is a public figure, does not forfeit all the privacy or individual protection.
本文结合新闻自由,探讨公众人物对自身形象权的保护范围。由于处理问题的方法不仅在美国和欧洲之间不同,而且在欧盟国家之间也不同,因此在形象权(公示权)和人格权(人格权)方面存在系统性的不一致。拉脱维亚需要引入类似于宣传权的适当法律术语,以描述个人受到保护,防止未经授权将其肖像(照片或视频)用于商业或其他公共目的的权利。尽管公众人物对媒体的保护较少,但在公共利益和私人利益之间建立适当的平衡是非常重要的,因为个人即使是公众人物,也不会丧失所有的隐私或个人保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信