Comparison of FOSS based profiling tools in Linux operating system environment

Tribid Debbarma, K. Chandrasekaran
{"title":"Comparison of FOSS based profiling tools in Linux operating system environment","authors":"Tribid Debbarma, K. Chandrasekaran","doi":"10.1109/IC3I.2016.7917936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current computing systems comes with different power management and profiling tools to run the system in its optimal state. Though the hardware systems have advanced a lot in-terms of energy efficiency and computing power, the software's energy and resources efficiency is still lacking behind. In many cases due to poor/bad designing of software it cannot utilize the hardware efficiently and end up a system with high energy consumption. To address this issues software' s need a careful profiling in its development process to make the software efficient and less resource hungry. In this paper we compared some of the profiling tools available as Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) which are used under Linux environment. These software tools uses different strategies and have different accuracies in finding a system and software programs behavior and its resource requirements. Their performance and resource overheads such as memory, CPU, disk consumption were compared and results are summarized for making the tools selection easier to researchers and developers alike. Another important issue with these tools are that, their reporting formats are not always easy to understand and it makes them less user friendly.","PeriodicalId":305971,"journal":{"name":"2016 2nd International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 2nd International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3I.2016.7917936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Current computing systems comes with different power management and profiling tools to run the system in its optimal state. Though the hardware systems have advanced a lot in-terms of energy efficiency and computing power, the software's energy and resources efficiency is still lacking behind. In many cases due to poor/bad designing of software it cannot utilize the hardware efficiently and end up a system with high energy consumption. To address this issues software' s need a careful profiling in its development process to make the software efficient and less resource hungry. In this paper we compared some of the profiling tools available as Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) which are used under Linux environment. These software tools uses different strategies and have different accuracies in finding a system and software programs behavior and its resource requirements. Their performance and resource overheads such as memory, CPU, disk consumption were compared and results are summarized for making the tools selection easier to researchers and developers alike. Another important issue with these tools are that, their reporting formats are not always easy to understand and it makes them less user friendly.
Linux操作系统环境下基于FOSS的分析工具比较
当前的计算系统配备了不同的电源管理和分析工具,以使系统处于最佳状态。虽然硬件系统在能源效率和计算能力方面有了很大的进步,但软件的能源和资源效率仍然落后。在很多情况下,由于软件设计不佳,不能有效地利用硬件,最终导致系统能耗高。为了解决这个问题,软件需要在其开发过程中仔细分析,以使软件效率高,资源消耗少。在本文中,我们比较了在Linux环境下使用的自由和开源软件(FOSS)的一些分析工具。这些软件工具使用不同的策略,并且在寻找系统和软件程序行为及其资源需求方面具有不同的准确性。比较了它们的性能和资源开销(如内存、CPU、磁盘消耗),并总结了结果,以便于研究人员和开发人员更容易地选择工具。这些工具的另一个重要问题是,它们的报告格式并不总是容易理解,这使得它们不那么用户友好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信