STUDI EVALUASI PEMANFAATAN PEDESTRIAN SEBAGAI FASILITAS PEJALAN KAKI PADA RUAS JALAN SOEKARNO HATTA KOTA BUKITTINGGI

Eric Muharnis, Ishak Ishak, Yorizal Putra
{"title":"STUDI EVALUASI PEMANFAATAN PEDESTRIAN SEBAGAI FASILITAS PEJALAN KAKI PADA RUAS JALAN SOEKARNO HATTA KOTA BUKITTINGGI","authors":"Eric Muharnis, Ishak Ishak, Yorizal Putra","doi":"10.33559/err.v2i3.1756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The development of pedestrian paths for the convenience of users is one of the considerations in the development and improvement of infrastructure quality. The purpose of this study is to analyze and evaluate pedestrian facilities in the Soekarno Hatta Street area, to find out whether the pedestrian path has functioned optimally and whether it meets the planning standards used, and to determine the perceptions and preferences of pedestrian path users. The data collection method used in this research is through random sampling technique, documentation technique, questionnaire or questionnaire, interview technique (interview), while the data processing tool is Microsoft Excel. The results of the research from a physical point of view regarding the location of pedestrian paths with an effective width of ± 1.5 meters already have pedestrian paths that are in accordance with the minimum standards of pedestrian paths in urban areas. For the aspect of user satisfaction on the condition of the pedestrian path, the percentage result is 52.2%. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that for the aspect of user satisfaction on the condition of the pedestrian path, it belongs to the Quite Comfortable (CN) criteria, for perceptions and preferences of the main comfort factor according to respondents, namely the shade must be improved, while for the inconvenience factor, namely too hot and parking. illegal activities, as well as the lack of road signs and infrastructure. Factors to increase comfort are the need to increase lighting facilities, benches, trash cans, and increase shade trees/canopies, analysis of perceptions and preferences about the function of pedestrian paths that choose the function of pedestrian paths as pedestrian paths, city beauty spaces and vehicle waiting rooms as the main priority, namely respondents stated consistent. The research analysis for validity using the SPSS application program from 12 question items regarding the condition of the pedestrian path was declared valid and for reliability it was declared reliable.Keywords: Comfort, Pedestrians, Pedestrian Paths.","PeriodicalId":273539,"journal":{"name":"Ensiklopedia Research and Community Service Review","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ensiklopedia Research and Community Service Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33559/err.v2i3.1756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The development of pedestrian paths for the convenience of users is one of the considerations in the development and improvement of infrastructure quality. The purpose of this study is to analyze and evaluate pedestrian facilities in the Soekarno Hatta Street area, to find out whether the pedestrian path has functioned optimally and whether it meets the planning standards used, and to determine the perceptions and preferences of pedestrian path users. The data collection method used in this research is through random sampling technique, documentation technique, questionnaire or questionnaire, interview technique (interview), while the data processing tool is Microsoft Excel. The results of the research from a physical point of view regarding the location of pedestrian paths with an effective width of ± 1.5 meters already have pedestrian paths that are in accordance with the minimum standards of pedestrian paths in urban areas. For the aspect of user satisfaction on the condition of the pedestrian path, the percentage result is 52.2%. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that for the aspect of user satisfaction on the condition of the pedestrian path, it belongs to the Quite Comfortable (CN) criteria, for perceptions and preferences of the main comfort factor according to respondents, namely the shade must be improved, while for the inconvenience factor, namely too hot and parking. illegal activities, as well as the lack of road signs and infrastructure. Factors to increase comfort are the need to increase lighting facilities, benches, trash cans, and increase shade trees/canopies, analysis of perceptions and preferences about the function of pedestrian paths that choose the function of pedestrian paths as pedestrian paths, city beauty spaces and vehicle waiting rooms as the main priority, namely respondents stated consistent. The research analysis for validity using the SPSS application program from 12 question items regarding the condition of the pedestrian path was declared valid and for reliability it was declared reliable.Keywords: Comfort, Pedestrians, Pedestrian Paths.
行人利用评估研究是武吉廷廷镇苏加诺哈塔路的行人设施
摘要:为方便使用者而开发行人通道是发展和提高基础设施质量的考虑因素之一。本研究的目的是分析和评估苏加诺哈达街地区的行人设施,以了解行人通道是否发挥了最佳功能,是否符合所使用的规划标准,并确定行人通道使用者的感知和偏好。本研究使用的数据收集方法是通过随机抽样技术、文献技术、问卷调查或问卷调查、访谈技术(interview),而数据处理工具是Microsoft Excel。从物理角度研究的结果来看,有效宽度为±1.5米的人行道的位置已经符合城市地区行人道路的最低标准。在行人通道条件的用户满意度方面,百分比结果为52.2%。根据研究结果,可以得出结论,对于用户对行人通道条件的满意度方面,它属于相当舒适(CN)标准,对于受访者的主要舒适因素的感知和偏好,即必须改善遮阳,而对于不便因素,即太热和停车。非法活动,以及缺乏道路标志和基础设施。增加舒适性的因素是需要增加照明设施、长凳、垃圾桶和增加遮荫树/天篷,分析对行人路径功能的感知和偏好,选择行人路径的功能作为行人路径,城市美丽空间和车辆候车室作为主要优先事项,即受访者表示一致。使用SPSS应用程序对12个关于行人通道状况的问题进行效度分析,效度分析为有效,信度分析为可靠。关键词:舒适性,行人,行人路径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信