Conclusions

P. Probert
{"title":"Conclusions","authors":"P. Probert","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198841609.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 10 draws the main conclusions together and offers some reflections on the old debate about the value of the Latin grammarians on the Latin accent. The book has largely set aside the question whether Latin grammarians tell us the truth about accents, but it has asked whether Latin grammarians’ statements, when taken on their own terms, are actually intended to pertain to the audible sound of Latin. This book has argued that it depends: some of their statements are so intended, and some are not. To finish with, the discussion is expanded to show how Latin grammarians treated prosody as they treated other aspects of the Latin language too, and how they proceeded as people usually do proceed when they learn techniques for talking about a language from people who use them to talk about a different language.","PeriodicalId":269582,"journal":{"name":"Latin Grammarians on the Latin Accent","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin Grammarians on the Latin Accent","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198841609.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 10 draws the main conclusions together and offers some reflections on the old debate about the value of the Latin grammarians on the Latin accent. The book has largely set aside the question whether Latin grammarians tell us the truth about accents, but it has asked whether Latin grammarians’ statements, when taken on their own terms, are actually intended to pertain to the audible sound of Latin. This book has argued that it depends: some of their statements are so intended, and some are not. To finish with, the discussion is expanded to show how Latin grammarians treated prosody as they treated other aspects of the Latin language too, and how they proceeded as people usually do proceed when they learn techniques for talking about a language from people who use them to talk about a different language.
结论
第十章总结了本文的主要结论,并对长期以来关于拉丁语法学家对拉丁口音价值的争论进行了反思。这本书在很大程度上搁置了拉丁语法学家是否告诉我们口音的真相的问题,但它提出了拉丁语法学家的陈述,当以他们自己的术语来看时,是否实际上是为了与拉丁语的可听声音有关。这本书认为这取决于:他们的一些陈述是有意的,而另一些则不是。最后,讨论扩展到拉丁语法学家是如何对待韵律的,就像他们对待拉丁语的其他方面一样,以及他们是如何像人们通常从别人那里学习谈论一种语言的技巧时那样进行的,而这些技巧是用来谈论另一种语言的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信