Collective litigation in China

Sutormin N. Alexandrovich
{"title":"Collective litigation in China","authors":"Sutormin N. Alexandrovich","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2022-1-56-60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is dedicated to collective litigation of China. The author researches such existing forms of collective actions as joint actions, representative actions and actions in public interests. The specific character of Chinese way of development of collective procedures is analyzed. The author concludes that Chinese regulation of representative actions is at the stage of formation and needs adjustment. One of the latest changes researched in the article became the reform of Securities Act in 2019–2020. On the whole China adopted the norms on collective regulation from Western countries and Japan, but at the same time these norms received national color. Some ideas, which were realized in China and became practically viable, can be adopted by our country.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2022-1-56-60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is dedicated to collective litigation of China. The author researches such existing forms of collective actions as joint actions, representative actions and actions in public interests. The specific character of Chinese way of development of collective procedures is analyzed. The author concludes that Chinese regulation of representative actions is at the stage of formation and needs adjustment. One of the latest changes researched in the article became the reform of Securities Act in 2019–2020. On the whole China adopted the norms on collective regulation from Western countries and Japan, but at the same time these norms received national color. Some ideas, which were realized in China and became practically viable, can be adopted by our country.
中国的集体诉讼
这篇文章是关于中国集体诉讼的。作者研究了集体行动的存在形式,包括联合行动、代表行动和公共利益行动。分析了中国集体程序发展方式的特点。笔者认为,中国的代表行为规制正处于形成阶段,需要调整。本文研究的最新变化之一是2019-2020年证券法的改革。中国总体上采用了西方国家和日本的集体规制规范,但同时这些规范也带有民族色彩。一些在中国已经实现并具有实际可行性的思想,可以为我国所借鉴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信