Comparing Analog and Digital Processing for Ultra Low-Power Embedded Artificial Intelligence

Sebastián Marzetti, V. Gies, V. Barchasz, H. Barthélemy, H. Glotin
{"title":"Comparing Analog and Digital Processing for Ultra Low-Power Embedded Artificial Intelligence","authors":"Sebastián Marzetti, V. Gies, V. Barchasz, H. Barthélemy, H. Glotin","doi":"10.1109/IoTaIS56727.2022.9975931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a comparison between analog and digital processing focused on ultra-low power embedded artificial intelligence is proposed. Several works developed before [1] –[6] demonstrate that features extraction and high sampling rate ADC are the most energy expensive tasks in fully digital embedded machine learning applications. Therefore, in this work analog and digital processing are compared, showing that under some conditions, analog processing is at least 30 times more efficient in terms of power consumption without taking into account the additional effect of the reduction of analog-to-digital sampling rate. Two case studies are presented: to set these ideas on a simple example, first order filter implementations using analog and digital circuits are first compared. Then, two techniques of spectrum analysis using digital FFT and analog filter benches are presented and discussed. Finally, a rule defining the situations where analog is more relevant than digital processing is proposed. This one can be used for intelligent Internet of Things (IoT) autonomous systems working on small batteries such as a single CR2032 coin cell for a very long time.","PeriodicalId":138894,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things and Intelligence Systems (IoTaIS)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things and Intelligence Systems (IoTaIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IoTaIS56727.2022.9975931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, a comparison between analog and digital processing focused on ultra-low power embedded artificial intelligence is proposed. Several works developed before [1] –[6] demonstrate that features extraction and high sampling rate ADC are the most energy expensive tasks in fully digital embedded machine learning applications. Therefore, in this work analog and digital processing are compared, showing that under some conditions, analog processing is at least 30 times more efficient in terms of power consumption without taking into account the additional effect of the reduction of analog-to-digital sampling rate. Two case studies are presented: to set these ideas on a simple example, first order filter implementations using analog and digital circuits are first compared. Then, two techniques of spectrum analysis using digital FFT and analog filter benches are presented and discussed. Finally, a rule defining the situations where analog is more relevant than digital processing is proposed. This one can be used for intelligent Internet of Things (IoT) autonomous systems working on small batteries such as a single CR2032 coin cell for a very long time.
超低功耗嵌入式人工智能的模拟和数字处理比较
本文以超低功耗嵌入式人工智能为研究对象,对模拟处理和数字处理进行了比较。在[1]-[6]之前开发的一些工作表明,特征提取和高采样率ADC是全数字嵌入式机器学习应用中最耗能的任务。因此,在这项工作中,模拟和数字处理进行了比较,表明在某些条件下,在不考虑降低模数采样率的额外影响的情况下,模拟处理在功耗方面的效率至少高出30倍。给出了两个案例研究:为了将这些思想放在一个简单的例子上,首先比较了使用模拟电路和数字电路实现的一阶滤波器。然后,提出并讨论了数字FFT和模拟滤波平台两种频谱分析技术。最后,提出了一个规则,定义了模拟处理比数字处理更相关的情况。它可以用于智能物联网(IoT)自主系统,在小型电池(如单个CR2032硬币电池)上工作很长时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信