A Comparative Analysis of Distributed Ledger Technologies for Smart Contract Development

Sofiane Benahmed, Ivan Pidikseev, Rasheed Hussain, Jooyoung Lee, S. Kazmi, A. Oracevic, Fatima Hussain
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Distributed Ledger Technologies for Smart Contract Development","authors":"Sofiane Benahmed, Ivan Pidikseev, Rasheed Hussain, Jooyoung Lee, S. Kazmi, A. Oracevic, Fatima Hussain","doi":"10.1109/PIMRC.2019.8904256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Development of Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT)-based applications requires an appropriate platform that meets the application requirements. However, due to the abundance of such platforms such as Ethereum, NEM, IOTA, and OpenChain, and the differences among them in terms of scalability, throughput, and features, it is not easy to select a platform for a given use-case. Selection of the right DLT platform is pivotal for the performance of applications and thus-forth directly affects consumer satisfaction. Therefore, the aforementioned factors must be taken into account to decide on a particular platform. To fill this gap, in this paper, we conduct a comparative analysis of different DLT platforms. The choice of platform is based on their popularity and current market share as well as the evolving trends and approaches. In essence, we choose Ethereum, EOS, Hyperledger Sawtooth and NEO. We compare these platforms from both development and performance perspectives. The comparison revealed that Sawtooth provides a huge customization capability that affects the performance and EOS maintains a stable throughput under varying network scales and loads.","PeriodicalId":412182,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 30th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 30th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PIMRC.2019.8904256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Development of Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT)-based applications requires an appropriate platform that meets the application requirements. However, due to the abundance of such platforms such as Ethereum, NEM, IOTA, and OpenChain, and the differences among them in terms of scalability, throughput, and features, it is not easy to select a platform for a given use-case. Selection of the right DLT platform is pivotal for the performance of applications and thus-forth directly affects consumer satisfaction. Therefore, the aforementioned factors must be taken into account to decide on a particular platform. To fill this gap, in this paper, we conduct a comparative analysis of different DLT platforms. The choice of platform is based on their popularity and current market share as well as the evolving trends and approaches. In essence, we choose Ethereum, EOS, Hyperledger Sawtooth and NEO. We compare these platforms from both development and performance perspectives. The comparison revealed that Sawtooth provides a huge customization capability that affects the performance and EOS maintains a stable throughput under varying network scales and loads.
面向智能合约开发的分布式账本技术比较分析
基于分布式账本技术(DLT)的应用开发需要一个合适的平台来满足应用需求。然而,由于以太坊、NEM、IOTA和OpenChain等平台的丰富,以及它们在可扩展性、吞吐量和功能方面的差异,为给定的用例选择一个平台并不容易。选择正确的DLT平台对于应用程序的性能至关重要,因此直接影响到消费者的满意度。因此,在选择一个特定的平台时,必须考虑上述因素。为了填补这一空白,本文对不同的DLT平台进行了比较分析。平台的选择是基于它们的受欢迎程度和当前的市场份额,以及不断发展的趋势和方法。本质上,我们选择以太坊、EOS、超级账本锯齿和NEO。我们从开发和性能两方面对这些平台进行比较。比较表明,Sawtooth提供了一个巨大的定制能力,影响性能,EOS在不同的网络规模和负载下保持稳定的吞吐量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信