A Critical Comparison of Utility-Type Ratemaking Methodologies in Oil Pipeline Regulation

P. Navarro, Bruce C. Petersen, T. Stauffer
{"title":"A Critical Comparison of Utility-Type Ratemaking Methodologies in Oil Pipeline Regulation","authors":"P. Navarro, Bruce C. Petersen, T. Stauffer","doi":"10.2307/3003563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article tests the efficacy of four formulas for specifying regulated utility rates. All exhibit \"intertemporal bias\" in that rates are disproportionately and seriously shifted forward upon current consumers (\"front-end loading\"), although the ICC and Consent Decree formulas yield rates less skewed than the utility and escalated utility rate formulas. \"Formula bias\" arises in all cases, because the ex post","PeriodicalId":177728,"journal":{"name":"The Bell Journal of Economics","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bell Journal of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3003563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

This article tests the efficacy of four formulas for specifying regulated utility rates. All exhibit "intertemporal bias" in that rates are disproportionately and seriously shifted forward upon current consumers ("front-end loading"), although the ICC and Consent Decree formulas yield rates less skewed than the utility and escalated utility rate formulas. "Formula bias" arises in all cases, because the ex post
输油管道管制中公用事业型费率制定方法的关键性比较
本文测试了四种规定管制公用事业费率的公式的有效性。所有这些都表现出“跨期偏差”,即费率不成比例地、严重地向当前消费者转移(“前端负荷”),尽管ICC和同意令公式产生的费率比公用事业和升级公用事业费率公式的倾斜程度要小。“公式偏差”在所有情况下都会出现,因为事后
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信