Measuring political knowledge: development and testing the scale in Russia

A. Klimova, Georgy Artamonov, K. Chmel
{"title":"Measuring political knowledge: development and testing the scale in Russia","authors":"A. Klimova, Georgy Artamonov, K. Chmel","doi":"10.19181/4m.2021.52.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To our knowledge, this is the first paper which develops and validates the scale of political knowledge in Russia. The scale was validated in a telephone survey using random sampling (N = 3002). The scale includes 10 questions on the knowledge of political institutes, main political actors, substantial events, international politics, and history of the state. The scale showed sufficiently high internal consistency. Cronbach’s alpha was equal to 0.74. In addition, the criterion and convergent validity of the instrument was tested based on socio-demographic variables, interest in politics, news discussion, media consumption, and political behavior. We found weak and medium Pearson correlation coefficients between political knowledge and socio-demographic variables. Convergent validity shows weak and medium correlation coefficients between political knowledge and interest in politics, frequency of discussion of political news, and media consumption. The strongest correlation was found with interest in politics. In addition, we found a positive correlation between political knowledge and such forms of political behavior as turnout at State Duma elections, signing petitions, and participating in campaigning. Finally, the IRT (Item-Response Theory) results showed quite a high quality of the scale. Overall, we conclude that this scale can be used to measure political knowledge in Russia.","PeriodicalId":271863,"journal":{"name":"Sociology: methodology, methods, mathematical modeling (Sociology: 4M)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology: methodology, methods, mathematical modeling (Sociology: 4M)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19181/4m.2021.52.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

To our knowledge, this is the first paper which develops and validates the scale of political knowledge in Russia. The scale was validated in a telephone survey using random sampling (N = 3002). The scale includes 10 questions on the knowledge of political institutes, main political actors, substantial events, international politics, and history of the state. The scale showed sufficiently high internal consistency. Cronbach’s alpha was equal to 0.74. In addition, the criterion and convergent validity of the instrument was tested based on socio-demographic variables, interest in politics, news discussion, media consumption, and political behavior. We found weak and medium Pearson correlation coefficients between political knowledge and socio-demographic variables. Convergent validity shows weak and medium correlation coefficients between political knowledge and interest in politics, frequency of discussion of political news, and media consumption. The strongest correlation was found with interest in politics. In addition, we found a positive correlation between political knowledge and such forms of political behavior as turnout at State Duma elections, signing petitions, and participating in campaigning. Finally, the IRT (Item-Response Theory) results showed quite a high quality of the scale. Overall, we conclude that this scale can be used to measure political knowledge in Russia.
衡量政治知识:俄罗斯的发展与规模测试
据我们所知,这是第一篇发展和验证俄罗斯政治知识规模的论文。该量表通过随机抽样的电话调查(N = 3002)进行验证。该量表包括10个问题,涉及政治机构、主要政治参与者、重大事件、国际政治和国家历史的知识。量表显示出足够高的内部一致性。Cronbach 's alpha = 0.74。此外,根据社会人口变量、对政治的兴趣、新闻讨论、媒体消费和政治行为,对该工具的标准和收敛效度进行了测试。我们发现政治知识和社会人口变量之间存在弱和中等的Pearson相关系数。趋同效度显示,政治知识与政治兴趣、政治新闻讨论频率、媒体消费之间存在弱相关系数和中等相关系数。对政治的兴趣是最强的相关性。此外,我们还发现政治知识与参加国家杜马选举、签署请愿书和参与竞选活动等形式的政治行为之间存在正相关关系。最后,IRT(项目反应理论)结果显示量表的质量相当高。总的来说,我们得出结论,这个量表可以用来衡量俄罗斯的政治知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信