A Tool for Automated Inspection of Software Design Documents and Its Empirical Evaluation in an Aviation Industry Setting

M. E. Coskun, M. Ceylan, Kadir Yigitozu, V. Garousi
{"title":"A Tool for Automated Inspection of Software Design Documents and Its Empirical Evaluation in an Aviation Industry Setting","authors":"M. E. Coskun, M. Ceylan, Kadir Yigitozu, V. Garousi","doi":"10.1109/ICSTW.2016.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While software inspection is an effective activity to detect defects early in the software development lifecycle, it is an effort-intensive and error-prone activity. Motivated by a real need in the context of the Turkish Aerospace Industries Inc. (TAI), a tool named AutoInspect was developed to (semi-) automate the inspection of software design documents and, as a result, to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the inspection process. We present in this paper the features of the tool, its development details and its initial evaluation for inspecting the design documents of three real systems in the company. The results of the initial case-study reveal that the tool is indeed able to increase the inspections efficiency and effectiveness. In terms of efficiency, inspection engineers who used AutoInspect performed 41-50% more efficiently, for the three design documents under study, compared to the case when the tool was not used (i.e., manual inspections). In terms of effectiveness, compared to manual inspections, the automated approach found between 23-33% more defects in the three design documents under study. As the tool currently only provides partial automation, our efforts are currently underway to increase its automation level even further.","PeriodicalId":335145,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTW.2016.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

While software inspection is an effective activity to detect defects early in the software development lifecycle, it is an effort-intensive and error-prone activity. Motivated by a real need in the context of the Turkish Aerospace Industries Inc. (TAI), a tool named AutoInspect was developed to (semi-) automate the inspection of software design documents and, as a result, to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the inspection process. We present in this paper the features of the tool, its development details and its initial evaluation for inspecting the design documents of three real systems in the company. The results of the initial case-study reveal that the tool is indeed able to increase the inspections efficiency and effectiveness. In terms of efficiency, inspection engineers who used AutoInspect performed 41-50% more efficiently, for the three design documents under study, compared to the case when the tool was not used (i.e., manual inspections). In terms of effectiveness, compared to manual inspections, the automated approach found between 23-33% more defects in the three design documents under study. As the tool currently only provides partial automation, our efforts are currently underway to increase its automation level even further.
航空工业背景下软件设计文档自动检测工具及其实证评价
虽然软件检查是在软件开发生命周期早期检测缺陷的有效活动,但它是一项工作量大且容易出错的活动。在土耳其航空航天工业公司(TAI)的实际需求的推动下,开发了一种名为AutoInspect的工具,用于(半)自动化软件设计文档的检查,从而提高了检查过程的效率和有效性。本文介绍了该工具的特点、开发细节以及对公司三个实际系统设计文件的初步评价。初步的案例研究结果表明,该工具确实能够提高检查的效率和效果。在效率方面,与不使用AutoInspect工具(即人工检查)的情况相比,使用AutoInspect的检查工程师对所研究的三个设计文档的效率提高了41-50%。就有效性而言,与人工检查相比,自动化方法在研究的三个设计文档中发现了23-33%的缺陷。由于该工具目前只提供部分自动化,我们目前正在努力进一步提高其自动化水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信