The half-life of MOOC knowledge: a randomized trial evaluating knowledge retention and retrieval practice in MOOCs

Dan Davis, René F. Kizilcec, C. Hauff, G. Houben
{"title":"The half-life of MOOC knowledge: a randomized trial evaluating knowledge retention and retrieval practice in MOOCs","authors":"Dan Davis, René F. Kizilcec, C. Hauff, G. Houben","doi":"10.1145/3170358.3170383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Retrieval practice has been established in the learning sciences as one of the most effective strategies to facilitate robust learning in traditional classroom contexts. The cognitive theory underpinning the \"testing effect\" states that actively recalling information is more effective than passively revisiting materials for storing information in long-term memory. We document the design, deployment, and evaluation of an Adaptive Retrieval Practice System (ARPS) in a MOOC. This push-based system leverages the testing effect to promote learner engagement and achievement by intelligently delivering quiz questions from prior course units to learners throughout the course. We conducted an experiment in which learners were randomized to receive ARPS in a MOOC to track their performance and behavior compared to a control group. In contrast to prior literature, we find no significant effect of retrieval practice in this MOOC environment. In the treatment condition, passing learners engaged more with ARPS but exhibited similar levels of knowledge retention as non-passing learners.","PeriodicalId":437369,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Retrieval practice has been established in the learning sciences as one of the most effective strategies to facilitate robust learning in traditional classroom contexts. The cognitive theory underpinning the "testing effect" states that actively recalling information is more effective than passively revisiting materials for storing information in long-term memory. We document the design, deployment, and evaluation of an Adaptive Retrieval Practice System (ARPS) in a MOOC. This push-based system leverages the testing effect to promote learner engagement and achievement by intelligently delivering quiz questions from prior course units to learners throughout the course. We conducted an experiment in which learners were randomized to receive ARPS in a MOOC to track their performance and behavior compared to a control group. In contrast to prior literature, we find no significant effect of retrieval practice in this MOOC environment. In the treatment condition, passing learners engaged more with ARPS but exhibited similar levels of knowledge retention as non-passing learners.
MOOC知识的半衰期:一项评估MOOC知识保留和检索实践的随机试验
在传统的课堂环境中,检索练习是促进稳健学习的最有效策略之一。支持“测试效应”的认知理论指出,在长期记忆中,主动回忆信息比被动重温材料更有效。我们记录了自适应检索实践系统(ARPS)在MOOC中的设计、部署和评估。这种基于推送的系统利用测试效果,通过在整个课程中智能地向学习者提供先前课程单元的测验问题,来促进学习者的参与和成就。我们进行了一项实验,在MOOC中,学习者随机接受ARPS,以跟踪他们的表现和行为,并与对照组进行比较。与之前的文献相比,我们发现在这种MOOC环境下检索练习没有显著的效果。在治疗条件下,及格学习者更多地参与ARPS,但表现出与不及格学习者相似的知识保留水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信