{"title":"MAGNA CARTA AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN FAMILY PROCEEDINGS","authors":"Nicholas Mostyn","doi":"10.5750/DLJ.V27I0.1107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We had a surprise in January 2012 when a practising QC was parachuted straight into the Supreme Court (as the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords became in 2009). But if there were expressions of discontent they were definitely sub rosa since the man in question, Jonathan Sumption QC, was then, and has since proved himself to be, pre-eminently qualified for the position. He is one of our foremost medieval historians, a Fellow of Magdalen College who taught History, before leaving to pursue a career at the Bar, where he rose to dizzy heights. His as yet uncompleted history of the Hundred Years’ War has received the highest praise. So it perhaps was not surprising that in this octocentenial year he should have been asked by the Friends of the British Library (an audience I warrant as challenging as this) to speak to them about Magna Carta on 9 March 2015. If I may say so, his address ‘Magna Carta then and now’ is a masterpiece. It completes the destruction of the hermeneutical myth originated by Sir Edward Coke which had been commenced by William McKechnie in his landmark essay published in 1905.","PeriodicalId":382436,"journal":{"name":"The Denning Law Journal","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Denning Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/DLJ.V27I0.1107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
We had a surprise in January 2012 when a practising QC was parachuted straight into the Supreme Court (as the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords became in 2009). But if there were expressions of discontent they were definitely sub rosa since the man in question, Jonathan Sumption QC, was then, and has since proved himself to be, pre-eminently qualified for the position. He is one of our foremost medieval historians, a Fellow of Magdalen College who taught History, before leaving to pursue a career at the Bar, where he rose to dizzy heights. His as yet uncompleted history of the Hundred Years’ War has received the highest praise. So it perhaps was not surprising that in this octocentenial year he should have been asked by the Friends of the British Library (an audience I warrant as challenging as this) to speak to them about Magna Carta on 9 March 2015. If I may say so, his address ‘Magna Carta then and now’ is a masterpiece. It completes the destruction of the hermeneutical myth originated by Sir Edward Coke which had been commenced by William McKechnie in his landmark essay published in 1905.
2012年1月,当一名执业QC直接空降至最高法院(正如2009年上议院司法委员会一样)时,我们感到很惊讶。但是,如果有不满的表达,那肯定是低调的,因为这个人,乔纳森·桑普森,当时是,而且后来证明了自己,非常适合这个职位。他是我们最重要的中世纪历史学家之一,是莫德林学院(Magdalen College)的一名教授历史的研究员,后来离开学院从事律师职业,在那里他达到了令人眩晕的高度。他尚未完成的百年战争史获得了最高的赞誉。因此,在大英图书馆之友(Friends of the British Library)邀请他在2015年3月9日就《大宪章》(Magna Carta)发表演讲,或许并不令人意外。如果我可以这么说,他的演讲“大宪章的过去和现在”是一个杰作。它完成了对爱德华·科克爵士发起的解释学神话的破坏,这一神话是由威廉·麦凯尼在1905年发表的一篇具有里程碑意义的文章中开始的。