Struggling to reply to reviewers: Some advice for novice researchers

Orlanda Harvey, Alison Taylor, P. Regmi, Edwin Roland van Teijlingen
{"title":"Struggling to reply to reviewers: Some advice for novice researchers","authors":"Orlanda Harvey, Alison Taylor, P. Regmi, Edwin Roland van Teijlingen","doi":"10.3126/hprospect.v21i2.42907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peer review is key in academic publishing, and rejection (or at least being asked to resubmit your paper to the journal), is a not uncommon occurrence. However, receiving such rejection and having to reply to it can be hard for the early-career researcher. \nIn this paper, we first highlight the role of the peer reviewer, followed by some of the less friendly reviewers’ comments to our own submitted papers in four case studies. We conclude with several suggestions of ways to deal with less than positive reviews.","PeriodicalId":230485,"journal":{"name":"Health Prospect","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Prospect","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/hprospect.v21i2.42907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peer review is key in academic publishing, and rejection (or at least being asked to resubmit your paper to the journal), is a not uncommon occurrence. However, receiving such rejection and having to reply to it can be hard for the early-career researcher. In this paper, we first highlight the role of the peer reviewer, followed by some of the less friendly reviewers’ comments to our own submitted papers in four case studies. We conclude with several suggestions of ways to deal with less than positive reviews.
挣扎着回复审稿人:给研究新手的一些建议
同行评议是学术出版的关键,拒绝(或至少被要求重新提交你的论文)并不罕见。然而,收到这样的拒绝,并不得不回复它可能是困难的早期职业研究人员。在本文中,我们首先强调了同行审稿人的作用,然后是一些不太友好的审稿人对我们自己提交的论文的评论。最后,我们提出了一些处理不太积极评论的方法建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信