How technology search facilitate technological innovation capability reconfiguration: Empirical study under emerging economy

Qingrui Xu, Litian Chen
{"title":"How technology search facilitate technological innovation capability reconfiguration: Empirical study under emerging economy","authors":"Qingrui Xu, Litian Chen","doi":"10.1109/ICMIT.2014.6942463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reconfiguration of technological innovation capability is an emergency issue for emerging economy. However, the “complementary or substitution” argument about the relationship among search strategies existed in recent studies, which hinders the reconfiguration of technological innovation capability. Thus, based on data from 253 high-tech enterprises, this paper employed cluster analysis and multi-logistic regression method to study the relationship between technology search and types of technological innovation capability during its reconfiguration process. There are several important results. Firstly, there are two dominant types of technological innovation capability during each stage of capability reconfiguration: a) knowledge assimilation capability; b) knowledge assimilation and creation capability. Secondly, there are different technology search facilitate each type of technological innovation capability during its reconfiguration: a)compared to other search strategy, the synergy between external boundary spanning search and internal boundary spanning search strategy, more easily lead to knowledge assimilation capability(compared to other capability structure types); b)compared to other knowledge search strategy, external boundary spanning search is more likely to result in knowledge assimilation and creation capability (compared to other types of capability structure types). This paper not only contributes dynamic capability and capability reconfiguration perspectives, but also has managerial implications.","PeriodicalId":148200,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMIT.2014.6942463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reconfiguration of technological innovation capability is an emergency issue for emerging economy. However, the “complementary or substitution” argument about the relationship among search strategies existed in recent studies, which hinders the reconfiguration of technological innovation capability. Thus, based on data from 253 high-tech enterprises, this paper employed cluster analysis and multi-logistic regression method to study the relationship between technology search and types of technological innovation capability during its reconfiguration process. There are several important results. Firstly, there are two dominant types of technological innovation capability during each stage of capability reconfiguration: a) knowledge assimilation capability; b) knowledge assimilation and creation capability. Secondly, there are different technology search facilitate each type of technological innovation capability during its reconfiguration: a)compared to other search strategy, the synergy between external boundary spanning search and internal boundary spanning search strategy, more easily lead to knowledge assimilation capability(compared to other capability structure types); b)compared to other knowledge search strategy, external boundary spanning search is more likely to result in knowledge assimilation and creation capability (compared to other types of capability structure types). This paper not only contributes dynamic capability and capability reconfiguration perspectives, but also has managerial implications.
技术搜索如何促进技术创新能力重构:新兴经济体背景下的实证研究
技术创新能力重构是新兴经济体亟待解决的问题。然而,目前研究中对于搜索策略之间的关系存在“互补还是替代”的争论,阻碍了技术创新能力的重新配置。因此,本文基于253家高新技术企业的数据,采用聚类分析和多元逻辑回归方法,研究了高新技术企业重组过程中技术搜索与技术创新能力类型之间的关系。有几个重要的结果。首先,在能力重构的各个阶段,技术创新能力主要有两种类型:a)知识同化能力;B)知识吸收和创造能力。其次,不同类型的技术搜索在其重构过程中对技术创新能力的促进作用不同:a)与其他搜索策略相比,外部边界跨越搜索与内部边界跨越搜索策略之间的协同作用,更容易产生知识同化能力(与其他能力结构类型相比);B)与其他知识搜索策略相比,外部边界跨越搜索更容易产生知识同化和创造能力(与其他类型的能力结构类型相比)。本文不仅提供了动态能力和能力重构的观点,而且具有管理意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信