Predictibilitate în individualizarea sancțiunilor. Studiu de jurisprudență asupra criteriilor de individualizare a măsurilor educative

Ștefana-Iuliana Sorohan
{"title":"Predictibilitate în individualizarea sancțiunilor. Studiu de jurisprudență asupra criteriilor de individualizare a măsurilor educative","authors":"Ștefana-Iuliana Sorohan","doi":"10.31178/aubd.2020.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The minority status places the offender in an area of ​​vulnerability, which is often within the reach of a combination of factors that influence his attitude towards social values. For this category of offenders, a special criminal liability system has been regulated, with specific sanctions, and the choice of their nature and duration must not be made arbitrarily, as any solution should be predictable and motivated by reference to the degree of social danger of the deeds and the dangerousness of the perpetrator. In order to understand the extent of these concepts it is necessary to perform an analysis of the general individualization criteria of sentencing as they are presented and interpreted by the legal practice. The current regulation is not dependent on the „malum non habet aetatem” principle, which is why it is useful to understand the arguments on the basis of which the court individualizes the anti-criminal reaction, placing on one hand the malum element, and on the other the objective and subjective data regarding the deed-perpetrator dichotomy.","PeriodicalId":142426,"journal":{"name":"Analele Universitării din București Drept","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analele Universitării din București Drept","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31178/aubd.2020.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The minority status places the offender in an area of ​​vulnerability, which is often within the reach of a combination of factors that influence his attitude towards social values. For this category of offenders, a special criminal liability system has been regulated, with specific sanctions, and the choice of their nature and duration must not be made arbitrarily, as any solution should be predictable and motivated by reference to the degree of social danger of the deeds and the dangerousness of the perpetrator. In order to understand the extent of these concepts it is necessary to perform an analysis of the general individualization criteria of sentencing as they are presented and interpreted by the legal practice. The current regulation is not dependent on the „malum non habet aetatem” principle, which is why it is useful to understand the arguments on the basis of which the court individualizes the anti-criminal reaction, placing on one hand the malum element, and on the other the objective and subjective data regarding the deed-perpetrator dichotomy.
少数群体地位使罪犯处于易受伤害的境地,这往往是影响其对社会价值态度的各种因素的综合影响范围。对于这一类违法者,已经规定了一项特别的刑事责任制度,并规定了具体的制裁措施,其性质和期限的选择不得武断,因为任何解决办法都应是可预测的,并应根据行为的社会危险程度和犯罪者的危险性加以推动。为了理解这些概念的范围,有必要对法律实践中提出和解释的一般量刑个体化标准进行分析。目前的规定并不依赖于“恶行不习惯”原则,这就是为什么理解法院将反犯罪反应个体化所依据的论据是有用的,一方面是恶行要素,另一方面是关于行为-犯罪者二分法的客观和主观数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信