Model-Driven Refactoring Approaches: A Comparison Criteria

Mohammed Misbhauddin, M. Alshayeb
{"title":"Model-Driven Refactoring Approaches: A Comparison Criteria","authors":"Mohammed Misbhauddin, M. Alshayeb","doi":"10.1109/ACSEAC.2012.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Model-driven engineering, an emerging trend in software engineering, has enabled the application of refactoring to UML models. Due to its growing popularity in the domain of refactoring, a number of approaches to specify models and transformation rules have been proposed in literature. A comparison framework is required by researchers and practitioners to guide them in selecting an appropriate approach suitable to their specific needs and trade-offs. In this paper, we provide a set of suitable criteria to evaluate and compare the various model refactoring approaches that can aid practitioners and researchers in the selection process. The paper also compares the refactoring approaches against the framework.","PeriodicalId":395297,"journal":{"name":"2012 African Conference for Sofware Engineering and Applied Computing","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 African Conference for Sofware Engineering and Applied Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSEAC.2012.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Model-driven engineering, an emerging trend in software engineering, has enabled the application of refactoring to UML models. Due to its growing popularity in the domain of refactoring, a number of approaches to specify models and transformation rules have been proposed in literature. A comparison framework is required by researchers and practitioners to guide them in selecting an appropriate approach suitable to their specific needs and trade-offs. In this paper, we provide a set of suitable criteria to evaluate and compare the various model refactoring approaches that can aid practitioners and researchers in the selection process. The paper also compares the refactoring approaches against the framework.
模型驱动重构方法:一个比较标准
模型驱动工程是软件工程中的一个新兴趋势,它使重构UML模型的应用成为可能。由于它在重构领域的日益流行,文献中已经提出了许多指定模型和转换规则的方法。研究人员和从业人员需要一个比较框架,以指导他们选择适合其具体需要和权衡的适当方法。在本文中,我们提供了一组合适的标准来评估和比较各种模型重构方法,可以帮助从业者和研究人员在选择过程中。本文还将重构方法与框架进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信