Why Conventional Engineering Laws are Irrational, and a Paradigm Shift that Results in Rational Laws

E. Adiutori
{"title":"Why Conventional Engineering Laws are Irrational, and a Paradigm Shift that Results in Rational Laws","authors":"E. Adiutori","doi":"10.34257/gjreavol22is2pg1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventional engineering laws are irrational for three reasons: When the laws are applied to nonlinear behavior, they have three variables to describe how two variables are related; they are founded on Fourier’s erroneous claims that dimensions can rationally be assigned to numbers, and dimensions can rationally be multiplied or divided. Until now, it has been globally accepted that parameter symbols in rational equations represent numerical value and dimension. The proposed paradigm shift requires that parameter symbols in equations represent only numerical value, and if an equation is quantitative, the dimension units that underlie parameter symbols must be specified in an accompanying nomenclature. The proposed paradigm shift results in laws and equations that are dimensionally homogeneous because they are dimensionless. The new laws are analogs of y = f{x}.The new laws state that the numerical value of parameter y is a function of the numerical value of parameter x, and the function may be proportional, linear, or nonlinear. The new laws are rational because they always have only two variables, they do not require that dimensions be assigned to numbers, and they do not require that parameter dimensions be multiplied or divided.","PeriodicalId":342934,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Researches in Engineering","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Researches in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34257/gjreavol22is2pg1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conventional engineering laws are irrational for three reasons: When the laws are applied to nonlinear behavior, they have three variables to describe how two variables are related; they are founded on Fourier’s erroneous claims that dimensions can rationally be assigned to numbers, and dimensions can rationally be multiplied or divided. Until now, it has been globally accepted that parameter symbols in rational equations represent numerical value and dimension. The proposed paradigm shift requires that parameter symbols in equations represent only numerical value, and if an equation is quantitative, the dimension units that underlie parameter symbols must be specified in an accompanying nomenclature. The proposed paradigm shift results in laws and equations that are dimensionally homogeneous because they are dimensionless. The new laws are analogs of y = f{x}.The new laws state that the numerical value of parameter y is a function of the numerical value of parameter x, and the function may be proportional, linear, or nonlinear. The new laws are rational because they always have only two variables, they do not require that dimensions be assigned to numbers, and they do not require that parameter dimensions be multiplied or divided.
为什么传统的工程法律是非理性的,以及导致理性法律的范式转变
传统的工程定律不合理的原因有三:当这些定律应用于非线性行为时,它们有三个变量来描述两个变量之间的关系;它们是建立在傅立叶错误的主张上的,即维度可以合理地分配给数字,维度可以合理地相乘或除法。迄今为止,有理方程中的参数符号表示数值和维数已被国际公认。所提议的范式转换要求方程中的参数符号仅表示数值,如果方程是定量的,则必须在随附的命名法中指定作为参数符号基础的维度单位。所提出的范式转移导致的定律和方程是维度齐次的,因为它们是无量纲的。新的定律类似于y = f{x}。新的定律表明参数y的数值是参数x数值的函数,这个函数可以是比例的、线性的或非线性的。新的定律是合理的,因为它们总是只有两个变量,它们不要求将维度分配给数字,它们不要求将参数维度相乘或除以。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信