Assessment of the Documentation Information System for Primary Health Care Accreditation Using Six Sigma Method in Bekasi, West Java

Dia Melisa Rafdi, D. Ayubi
{"title":"Assessment of the Documentation Information System for Primary Health Care Accreditation Using Six Sigma Method in Bekasi, West Java","authors":"Dia Melisa Rafdi, D. Ayubi","doi":"10.26911/the6thicph-FP.04.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Accreditation is a method used to improve and measure the quality of health service. Documentation information system is a basic accreditation assessment in primary health care. However, it has some barriers to implement, which reduced its quality. Six sigma is a management tool that may be used to improve the quality of documentation information system. This study aimed to assess the documentation information system for primary health care accreditation using six sigma method. Subjects and Method: This was a qualitative study conducted at Bekasi District Health Office, Bekasi, West Java, from July to August 2019. A sample of 7 informants was selected for this study by purposive sampling, including 1 manager of the quality of health service and accreditation, 3 accreditation companions, 3 representatives from accreditation working group. The data were obtained from in-depth interview and document review. The data were analyzed using six sigma method with 5 stages namely DMAIC (define, measure, analyze, improve, control), Results: The six sigma included: (1) Defineclarified objective and test the benefit of each process, determine the resources needed, and the impact they cause; (2) Measure-measuring the performance by explaining it through process metric; (3) Analyzeanalyze the main causes in the process by using cause and effect diagram; (4) Improveproposed improvement to overcome the problem. This study was carried out only at the improve stage. Man, Money, Method, and Material were associated with the quality of documentation information system in primary health. Conclusion: The method of documentation is significant factor that associated with the quality of documentation information system.","PeriodicalId":187475,"journal":{"name":"Strengthening Hospital Competitiveness to Improve Patient Satisfaction and Better Health Outcomes","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strengthening Hospital Competitiveness to Improve Patient Satisfaction and Better Health Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26911/the6thicph-FP.04.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accreditation is a method used to improve and measure the quality of health service. Documentation information system is a basic accreditation assessment in primary health care. However, it has some barriers to implement, which reduced its quality. Six sigma is a management tool that may be used to improve the quality of documentation information system. This study aimed to assess the documentation information system for primary health care accreditation using six sigma method. Subjects and Method: This was a qualitative study conducted at Bekasi District Health Office, Bekasi, West Java, from July to August 2019. A sample of 7 informants was selected for this study by purposive sampling, including 1 manager of the quality of health service and accreditation, 3 accreditation companions, 3 representatives from accreditation working group. The data were obtained from in-depth interview and document review. The data were analyzed using six sigma method with 5 stages namely DMAIC (define, measure, analyze, improve, control), Results: The six sigma included: (1) Defineclarified objective and test the benefit of each process, determine the resources needed, and the impact they cause; (2) Measure-measuring the performance by explaining it through process metric; (3) Analyzeanalyze the main causes in the process by using cause and effect diagram; (4) Improveproposed improvement to overcome the problem. This study was carried out only at the improve stage. Man, Money, Method, and Material were associated with the quality of documentation information system in primary health. Conclusion: The method of documentation is significant factor that associated with the quality of documentation information system.
西爪哇勿加西使用六西格玛方法评估初级卫生保健认证文件信息系统
背景:认证是一种用于改善和衡量卫生服务质量的方法。文件信息系统是初级卫生保健的一项基本认证评估。然而,它的实施有一些障碍,这降低了它的质量。六西格玛是一种管理工具,可用于提高文件化信息系统的质量。本研究旨在运用六西格玛方法评估基层卫生保健认证的文件信息系统。对象和方法:这是一项定性研究,于2019年7月至8月在西爪哇勿加西地区卫生办事处进行。本研究采用目的抽样的方法,选取7名举报人,其中卫生服务质量与认可管理人员1名,认可陪同人员3名,认可工作组代表3名。数据通过深度访谈和文献查阅获得。采用六西格玛方法对数据进行分析,分为5个阶段,即DMAIC(定义、测量、分析、改进、控制)。结果:六西格玛包括:(1)明确目标,测试每个过程的效益,确定所需资源及其产生的影响;(2)度量——通过过程度量对绩效进行解释来度量绩效;(3)分析利用因果关系图分析过程中的主要原因;(4)提出改进方案以克服问题。本研究仅在改良阶段进行。人、钱、方法、材料与基层卫生文献信息系统质量相关。结论:文件编制方法是影响文件编制信息系统质量的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信