Rapid Reliable EID50 Determination for live Newcastle Disease Viruses and Vaccines

A. Eid, A. Ismail, H. Gouda, Reham M Elbakrey
{"title":"Rapid Reliable EID50 Determination for live Newcastle Disease Viruses and Vaccines","authors":"A. Eid, A. Ismail, H. Gouda, Reham M Elbakrey","doi":"10.21608/zvjz.2022.179646.1196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Newcastle disease (ND) was first recognized more than nine decades ago and continues to be a problem for poultry producers besides being enzootic in many countries including Egypt. Diagnostic and ND virus/vaccine titration are core objects in virus evaluation. A rapid assay based on micro plate hemagglutination (HA) activity was applied to investigate its reliability as alternative method for virus titration. A comparative determination of EID50 /0.1ml was carried out via chicken embryo (CE) inoculation for 35 Newcastle disease virus (NDV) strains. They are previously identified by pathogenicity indices and revealed variable virulence (lentogenicmesogenic and velogenic). The data for both methods were analyzed using SPSS version 25. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed that HA titer method did not elicit a statistically significant change in median of reading Virus titer of samples with the median of standard embryonated chicken egg (ECE) method (Z = -0.197, p = 0.844). Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r= 0.42, p =0.01) showed a noteworthy moderate correlation between two methods. Heat map showed the differences between each pair of methods and the relationship between them. Bland-Altman plot revealed difference which fit normality distribution W=0.96, p=0.24. Accordingly, the use of HA activity assay for NDV/vaccine titration is a rapid easy and reliable, especially when needed for primary evaluation.","PeriodicalId":137314,"journal":{"name":"Zagazig Veterinary Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zagazig Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/zvjz.2022.179646.1196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Newcastle disease (ND) was first recognized more than nine decades ago and continues to be a problem for poultry producers besides being enzootic in many countries including Egypt. Diagnostic and ND virus/vaccine titration are core objects in virus evaluation. A rapid assay based on micro plate hemagglutination (HA) activity was applied to investigate its reliability as alternative method for virus titration. A comparative determination of EID50 /0.1ml was carried out via chicken embryo (CE) inoculation for 35 Newcastle disease virus (NDV) strains. They are previously identified by pathogenicity indices and revealed variable virulence (lentogenicmesogenic and velogenic). The data for both methods were analyzed using SPSS version 25. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed that HA titer method did not elicit a statistically significant change in median of reading Virus titer of samples with the median of standard embryonated chicken egg (ECE) method (Z = -0.197, p = 0.844). Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r= 0.42, p =0.01) showed a noteworthy moderate correlation between two methods. Heat map showed the differences between each pair of methods and the relationship between them. Bland-Altman plot revealed difference which fit normality distribution W=0.96, p=0.24. Accordingly, the use of HA activity assay for NDV/vaccine titration is a rapid easy and reliable, especially when needed for primary evaluation.
新城疫活病毒及疫苗EID50快速可靠测定
新城疫(ND)在90多年前首次被发现,除了在包括埃及在内的许多国家流行外,它仍然是家禽生产者的一个问题。诊断和ND病毒/疫苗滴定是病毒评价的核心对象。应用微板血凝(HA)活性快速测定法,考察其作为病毒滴定替代方法的可靠性。采用鸡胚接种法对35株新城疫病毒(NDV)进行了EID50 /0.1ml的比较测定。它们以前是通过致病性指数确定的,并显示出不同的毒力(慢原性、中原性和速原性)。两种方法的数据均采用SPSS版本25进行分析。Wilcoxon sign -rank检验表明,HA滴度法与ECE法的中位数差异无统计学意义(Z = -0.197, p = 0.844)。Spearman相关系数(r= 0.42, p =0.01)显示两种方法之间存在显著的中度相关。热图显示了每对方法之间的差异以及它们之间的关系。Bland-Altman图显示差异符合正态分布W=0.96, p=0.24。因此,使用HA活性测定法进行新城疫/疫苗滴定是一种快速、简便、可靠的方法,特别是在需要进行初步评价时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信