A comparative survey of scenario-based to state-based model synthesis approaches

Hongzhi Liang, J. Dingel, Z. Diskin
{"title":"A comparative survey of scenario-based to state-based model synthesis approaches","authors":"Hongzhi Liang, J. Dingel, Z. Diskin","doi":"10.1145/1138953.1138956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Model Driven Development and Use Case Driven Development methodologies have inspired the proposal of a variety of software engineering approaches that synthesize state-based models from scenario-based models. However, little work has been done to comprehensively compare these different synthesis approaches. In this paper, we define a set of comparison criteria, and survey 21 different synthesis approaches presented in the literature based on the criteria. The differences and similarities are highlighted in the comparison results. We then discuss the challenges that current approaches may face and provide suggestions for future work for state-based model syntheses.","PeriodicalId":151927,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Scenarios and state machines: models, algorithms, and tools","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"96","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Workshop on Scenarios and state machines: models, algorithms, and tools","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1138953.1138956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 96

Abstract

Model Driven Development and Use Case Driven Development methodologies have inspired the proposal of a variety of software engineering approaches that synthesize state-based models from scenario-based models. However, little work has been done to comprehensively compare these different synthesis approaches. In this paper, we define a set of comparison criteria, and survey 21 different synthesis approaches presented in the literature based on the criteria. The differences and similarities are highlighted in the comparison results. We then discuss the challenges that current approaches may face and provide suggestions for future work for state-based model syntheses.
基于场景和基于状态的模型综合方法的比较研究
模型驱动开发和用例驱动开发方法激发了各种软件工程方法的建议,这些方法从基于场景的模型中综合了基于状态的模型。然而,对这些不同的合成方法进行综合比较的工作很少。在本文中,我们定义了一套比较标准,并在此基础上调查了文献中提出的21种不同的综合方法。对比结果突出了两者的异同。然后,我们讨论了当前方法可能面临的挑战,并为基于状态的模型综合的未来工作提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信