{"title":"Coordinated Data Analysis: A New Method for the Study of Personality and Health","authors":"S. Weston, E. Graham, A. Piccinin","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/k9up8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A majority of research by personality psychologists examining health has utilized publicly available datasets, for good reason. These resources are often the only available datasets large enough to detect expected effect sizes and may contain biological or genetic data that is difficult to obtain. However, researchers tend to examine only one large dataset at a time. Given recent meta-research on the robustness and replicability of \"established\" findings, all researchers should take greater care to evaluate the evidentiary value of their findings and seek methods to increase their robustness. Personality and aging psychologists who use publicly available datasets have a unique tool at their disposal in order to achieve this goal, namely, more publicly available datasets. More specifically, psychologists may use coordinated analysis (Hofer and Piccinin, 2009; Piccinin and Hofer, 2008) to examine relationships across several large datasets and, using the tools of meta-analysis, identify generalizable effect sizes and examine heterogeneity across countries and methods. This chapter describes the motivation for coordinated analysis, the process of using this method, and details several examples.","PeriodicalId":310455,"journal":{"name":"International Perspectives on Aging","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Perspectives on Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/k9up8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
A majority of research by personality psychologists examining health has utilized publicly available datasets, for good reason. These resources are often the only available datasets large enough to detect expected effect sizes and may contain biological or genetic data that is difficult to obtain. However, researchers tend to examine only one large dataset at a time. Given recent meta-research on the robustness and replicability of "established" findings, all researchers should take greater care to evaluate the evidentiary value of their findings and seek methods to increase their robustness. Personality and aging psychologists who use publicly available datasets have a unique tool at their disposal in order to achieve this goal, namely, more publicly available datasets. More specifically, psychologists may use coordinated analysis (Hofer and Piccinin, 2009; Piccinin and Hofer, 2008) to examine relationships across several large datasets and, using the tools of meta-analysis, identify generalizable effect sizes and examine heterogeneity across countries and methods. This chapter describes the motivation for coordinated analysis, the process of using this method, and details several examples.
人格心理学家检查健康的大多数研究都利用了公开可用的数据集,这是有充分理由的。这些资源往往是唯一可用的大到足以检测预期效应大小的数据集,并且可能包含难以获得的生物或遗传数据。然而,研究人员倾向于一次只检查一个大数据集。鉴于最近关于“已建立”研究结果的稳健性和可复制性的元研究,所有研究人员都应该更加谨慎地评估其研究结果的证据价值,并寻求增加其稳健性的方法。使用公开可用数据集的人格和衰老心理学家有一个独特的工具可供他们使用,以实现这一目标,即更多的公开可用数据集。更具体地说,心理学家可能会使用协调分析(Hofer和Piccinin, 2009;Piccinin and Hofer, 2008)来检查几个大型数据集之间的关系,并使用荟萃分析工具,确定可推广的效应大小,并检查不同国家和方法之间的异质性。本章描述了协调分析的动机,使用这种方法的过程,并详细介绍了几个例子。