JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF JUDGE'S DECISIONS IN THE CRIME OF THREATENING AND FRIGHTENING ADDRESSED PERSONALLY

L. Sihombing
{"title":"JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF JUDGE'S DECISIONS IN THE CRIME OF THREATENING AND FRIGHTENING ADDRESSED PERSONALLY","authors":"L. Sihombing","doi":"10.58471/jms.v3i01.2529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In addition to having a positive impact, technology also has a negative impact on society, including the emergence of more and more new crimes, namely computer crimes, such as internet fraud, hacking of ATM PIN, burglary of banking accounts, the rise of fake social media, pornographic media, and defamation through the internet. This study aims to legally analyze the judge's decision in the criminal act of threats and intimidation directed personally related to Law Number 11 of 2008. This study uses a descriptive analysis method with a normative juridical approach. The reference for the panel of judges in deciding cases is the prosecutor's indictment, not the indictment by taking into account the evidence. The judge's considerations are deemed appropriate to be able to sentence the defendant. Regulations and sanctions for all forms of social media use must be in line with the ideals in which Law Number 11 of 2008 was made to protect and maintain the comfort of social media users. So that in the future social media users can use it wisely to build a modern and law-abiding society. In this case law enforcers must see that the use of social media is increasingly being used at this time, this causes the use of social media to become uncontrollable, causing losses to the parties. \n  \n ","PeriodicalId":141276,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Multidisiplin Sahombu","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Multidisiplin Sahombu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58471/jms.v3i01.2529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In addition to having a positive impact, technology also has a negative impact on society, including the emergence of more and more new crimes, namely computer crimes, such as internet fraud, hacking of ATM PIN, burglary of banking accounts, the rise of fake social media, pornographic media, and defamation through the internet. This study aims to legally analyze the judge's decision in the criminal act of threats and intimidation directed personally related to Law Number 11 of 2008. This study uses a descriptive analysis method with a normative juridical approach. The reference for the panel of judges in deciding cases is the prosecutor's indictment, not the indictment by taking into account the evidence. The judge's considerations are deemed appropriate to be able to sentence the defendant. Regulations and sanctions for all forms of social media use must be in line with the ideals in which Law Number 11 of 2008 was made to protect and maintain the comfort of social media users. So that in the future social media users can use it wisely to build a modern and law-abiding society. In this case law enforcers must see that the use of social media is increasingly being used at this time, this causes the use of social media to become uncontrollable, causing losses to the parties.    
对威胁恐吓罪中法官判决的司法分析进行了个人化论述
除了积极的影响之外,技术也对社会产生了消极的影响,包括越来越多的新犯罪的出现,即计算机犯罪,如网络欺诈,黑客入侵ATM密码,盗窃银行账户,虚假社交媒体,色情媒体和通过互联网诽谤的兴起。本研究旨在从法律上分析法官在与2008年第11号法律有关的个人威胁和恐吓犯罪行为中的判决。本研究采用描述性分析方法与规范的司法方法。法官小组在裁决案件时参考的是检察官的起诉书,而不是考虑到证据的起诉书。法官的考虑被认为是适当的,可以给被告判刑。对所有形式的社交媒体使用的规定和制裁必须符合2008年第11号法律的理想,即保护和维持社交媒体用户的舒适。这样,在未来的社交媒体用户可以明智地使用它来建设一个现代和守法的社会。在这种情况下,执法人员必须看到,社交媒体的使用在这个时候越来越多,这导致社交媒体的使用变得无法控制,给当事人造成损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信