Evaluation of characterization models for the photochemical smog impact category focused on the Brazilian reality

Sandy Bernardi Falcadi Tedesco Girotto, F. Simioni, Y. Tadano, Valdeci José Costa, R. Alvarenga
{"title":"Evaluation of characterization models for the photochemical smog impact category focused on the Brazilian reality","authors":"Sandy Bernardi Falcadi Tedesco Girotto, F. Simioni, Y. Tadano, Valdeci José Costa, R. Alvarenga","doi":"10.18225/lalca.v3i0.4263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) is composed of characterization models, and in Brazil, the methodological and scientific LCIA framework is still under development. The research’s aim was to evaluate the literature available characterization models to photochemical smog category. Thus, the contribution of work is recommending one of these models to be used in Brazilian LCA studies, standardizing the studies in Brazil. The methodology consisted of searching the literature and selecting, describing and analyzing the characterization models as well as elaborating a table of criteria for better comparison. Aiming to visualize the differences in the results of each selected model, a case study was applied to analyze the photochemical smog formation potential to the transport of one ton of sugar using two transportation modes (road and railroad). Five characterization models related to smog category were selected, described and compared. Herewith, it was observed that the models present significant differences, that is, each model presents Characterization Factors (CF) for different categories within the environmental impact chain of the photochemical smog (midpoint and/or endpoint), differences in modeling, scale of the model (regional, continental or global), quantity and quality of elementary flows, etc. Those factors have influence in the CF’s calculation and, consequently, the LCA’s results, in the same case study. The criteria table’s results suggested that the model of Van Zelm et al. (2016) – World (midpoint and endpoint), is the best interim option to be used in studies of LCA in Brazil, because it was the model that resulted in the highest grade referring to the established criteria and it presents results on a Global scale. However, the results do not rule out the need for regionalization studies, which would develop a model that presents results and studies directed to the Brazilian reality or adjust the model of Van Zelm et al. (2016) - Brazil","PeriodicalId":374926,"journal":{"name":"LALCA: Revista Latino-Americana em Avaliação do Ciclo de Vida","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LALCA: Revista Latino-Americana em Avaliação do Ciclo de Vida","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18225/lalca.v3i0.4263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) is composed of characterization models, and in Brazil, the methodological and scientific LCIA framework is still under development. The research’s aim was to evaluate the literature available characterization models to photochemical smog category. Thus, the contribution of work is recommending one of these models to be used in Brazilian LCA studies, standardizing the studies in Brazil. The methodology consisted of searching the literature and selecting, describing and analyzing the characterization models as well as elaborating a table of criteria for better comparison. Aiming to visualize the differences in the results of each selected model, a case study was applied to analyze the photochemical smog formation potential to the transport of one ton of sugar using two transportation modes (road and railroad). Five characterization models related to smog category were selected, described and compared. Herewith, it was observed that the models present significant differences, that is, each model presents Characterization Factors (CF) for different categories within the environmental impact chain of the photochemical smog (midpoint and/or endpoint), differences in modeling, scale of the model (regional, continental or global), quantity and quality of elementary flows, etc. Those factors have influence in the CF’s calculation and, consequently, the LCA’s results, in the same case study. The criteria table’s results suggested that the model of Van Zelm et al. (2016) – World (midpoint and endpoint), is the best interim option to be used in studies of LCA in Brazil, because it was the model that resulted in the highest grade referring to the established criteria and it presents results on a Global scale. However, the results do not rule out the need for regionalization studies, which would develop a model that presents results and studies directed to the Brazilian reality or adjust the model of Van Zelm et al. (2016) - Brazil
对光化学烟雾影响类别的表征模型的评价侧重于巴西的现实
生命周期影响评估(LCIA)由特征模型组成,在巴西,方法和科学的LCIA框架仍在开发中。本研究的目的是评价现有的光化学烟雾分类表征模型。因此,工作的贡献是推荐其中一种模型用于巴西的LCA研究,使巴西的研究标准化。方法包括检索文献,选择、描述和分析表征模型,以及制定标准表,以便更好地进行比较。为了可视化每种选择模型结果的差异,应用案例研究分析了使用两种运输方式(公路和铁路)运输一吨糖的光化学烟雾形成潜力。选择、描述和比较了与雾霾类别相关的五种表征模型。由此可见,各模式存在显著差异,即每个模式对光化学雾霾环境影响链内不同类别(中点和/或终点)、模式差异、模式尺度(区域、大陆或全球)、基本流量的数量和质量等都有不同的表征因子(CF)。在同一案例研究中,这些因素会影响CF的计算,从而影响LCA的结果。标准表的结果表明,Van Zelm et al. (2016) - World(中点和终点)模型是巴西LCA研究中使用的最佳临时选择,因为根据已建立的标准,该模型得出的评分最高,并且在全球范围内呈现结果。然而,研究结果并不排除区域化研究的必要性,区域化研究将开发一个模型,呈现针对巴西现实的结果和研究,或调整Van Zelm等人(2016)-巴西的模型
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信