How Much is Privacy Worth Around the World and Across Platforms?

Jeffrey T. Prince, S. Wallsten
{"title":"How Much is Privacy Worth Around the World and Across Platforms?","authors":"Jeffrey T. Prince, S. Wallsten","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3528386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data privacy has become a controversial policy issue around the world. The EU passed strict privacy rules, the state of California has rules coming into effect in 2020, and the U.S. FTC and Congress are pursuing privacy agendas. However, limited empirical evidence illuminates how much consumers value privacy or how their valuations vary across or within countries and contexts. In this paper, we measure individuals’ valuation of online privacy across a wide range of countries and data types. The online information we consider includes personal information on finances, biometrics, location, networks, communications, and web browsing. The countries we analyze include the United States, Mexico, Brazil, Colombia, Argentina, and Germany. We conduct these measures using carefully designed, internationally distributed, discrete choice surveys. These surveys allow us to measure tradeoffs across these aspects of online privacy, and importantly, allow us to make relative comparisons of these tradeoffs across many countries. \n \nWe find that people in Germany place the highest value on privacy compared to the U.S. and Latin American countries. Across countries, people place the highest value on keeping financial and biometric information private — balance and fingerprint data in particular. Germany’s status as the country with highest value for privacy is driven largely by extremely strong preferences for keeping financial data private. German respondents were willing to share bank balance information in exchange for monthly payments of $15.43 and cash withdrawal information for $13.42/month. People had to be paid the least for permission to receive ads, meaning people are much less concerned about ads than any of the other types of data we explored. Indeed, in Argentina, Colombia, and Mexico, the average respondent was willing to pay small amounts to receive ads, suggesting that people in those countries like receiving ads. Location privacy also turned out to be among the least valuable to people in every country. \n \nWe also find that women value privacy more than men do across platforms, data types, and countries and older people value privacy more than younger people. We find no real differences across income in privacy preferences. \n \nThese results are largely robust to a randomly controlled treatment, where a group of survey respondents received a written statement about the value of data collection by these entities. Preferences for privacy are generally unaffected by such a prompt, suggesting that their values of only privacy are reasonably stable and not easily influenced.","PeriodicalId":109453,"journal":{"name":"TPRC48: Conference Proceedings","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TPRC48: Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3528386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Data privacy has become a controversial policy issue around the world. The EU passed strict privacy rules, the state of California has rules coming into effect in 2020, and the U.S. FTC and Congress are pursuing privacy agendas. However, limited empirical evidence illuminates how much consumers value privacy or how their valuations vary across or within countries and contexts. In this paper, we measure individuals’ valuation of online privacy across a wide range of countries and data types. The online information we consider includes personal information on finances, biometrics, location, networks, communications, and web browsing. The countries we analyze include the United States, Mexico, Brazil, Colombia, Argentina, and Germany. We conduct these measures using carefully designed, internationally distributed, discrete choice surveys. These surveys allow us to measure tradeoffs across these aspects of online privacy, and importantly, allow us to make relative comparisons of these tradeoffs across many countries. We find that people in Germany place the highest value on privacy compared to the U.S. and Latin American countries. Across countries, people place the highest value on keeping financial and biometric information private — balance and fingerprint data in particular. Germany’s status as the country with highest value for privacy is driven largely by extremely strong preferences for keeping financial data private. German respondents were willing to share bank balance information in exchange for monthly payments of $15.43 and cash withdrawal information for $13.42/month. People had to be paid the least for permission to receive ads, meaning people are much less concerned about ads than any of the other types of data we explored. Indeed, in Argentina, Colombia, and Mexico, the average respondent was willing to pay small amounts to receive ads, suggesting that people in those countries like receiving ads. Location privacy also turned out to be among the least valuable to people in every country. We also find that women value privacy more than men do across platforms, data types, and countries and older people value privacy more than younger people. We find no real differences across income in privacy preferences. These results are largely robust to a randomly controlled treatment, where a group of survey respondents received a written statement about the value of data collection by these entities. Preferences for privacy are generally unaffected by such a prompt, suggesting that their values of only privacy are reasonably stable and not easily influenced.
隐私在全球和跨平台上的价值是多少?
数据隐私已经成为世界范围内一个有争议的政策问题。欧盟通过了严格的隐私法规,加利福尼亚州的法规将于2020年生效,美国联邦贸易委员会和国会正在推进隐私议程。然而,有限的经验证据阐明了消费者对隐私的重视程度,或者他们的估值在不同国家和背景下如何变化。在本文中,我们衡量了个人在广泛的国家和数据类型的在线隐私的估值。我们考虑的在线信息包括财务、生物特征、位置、网络、通信和网页浏览等个人信息。我们分析的国家包括美国、墨西哥、巴西、哥伦比亚、阿根廷和德国。我们使用精心设计的、国际分布的、离散的选择调查来进行这些测量。这些调查使我们能够衡量在线隐私的这些方面的权衡,重要的是,使我们能够对许多国家的这些权衡进行相对比较。我们发现,与美国和拉丁美洲国家相比,德国人最重视隐私。在各个国家,人们最重视保持财务和生物特征信息的私密性,尤其是余额和指纹数据。德国之所以能成为最重视隐私的国家,很大程度上是因为德国人对保持金融数据隐私的强烈偏好。德国受访者愿意分享银行余额信息,以换取每月15.43美元的支付和13.42美元的现金提取信息。人们必须以最少的费用获得接收广告的许可,这意味着人们对广告的关注远远少于我们探索的任何其他类型的数据。事实上,在阿根廷、哥伦比亚和墨西哥,平均受访者愿意支付小额费用来接收广告,这表明这些国家的人们喜欢接收广告。在每个国家,位置隐私也被证明是最不受重视的。我们还发现,在不同的平台、数据类型和国家,女性比男性更重视隐私,老年人比年轻人更重视隐私。我们发现不同收入的人在隐私偏好上没有真正的差异。这些结果在随机对照处理中基本上是稳健的,在随机对照处理中,一组调查受访者收到了关于这些实体收集数据价值的书面声明。对隐私的偏好通常不受这种提示的影响,这表明他们只关注隐私的价值观相当稳定,不容易受到影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信