Oxygen uptake during arm cranking with and without leg electrical stimulation in able bodied individuals

L. Burkett, W. Phillips, Jacquelynn P. Paul
{"title":"Oxygen uptake during arm cranking with and without leg electrical stimulation in able bodied individuals","authors":"L. Burkett, W. Phillips, Jacquelynn P. Paul","doi":"10.1080/15438629709512085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ten able bodied subjects (AB) volunteered to be tested with a Respond II neuromuscular stimulator applied to the lower extremities during submaximal arm crank exercise (ACE) to determine its effect on heart rate (min−1) and VO2 in ml·min−1 ·kg−1. One to two hours after a maximal ACE test, subjects performed four 9‐minute submaximal bouts of ACE; two at 25% and two at 70% of VO2peak. Each work rate was performed with and without, a randomly ordered, electrical stimulation (ES) of the quadriceps and hamstring muscle groups respectively. Electrical stimulation intensity was determined by a subject's maximal tolerance. Data, from four submaximum tests were analyzed with a two 2×2 repeated measures analysis of variance. The main effects were work rate (25% VO2peak and 70% VO2peak) and electrical stimulation (STIM) no stimulation (NOSTIM). No statistical differences was found between the STIM and NOSTIM in VO2 or heart rate at either 25% VO2peak (11.0 ml·min−1·kg−1 vs. 11.2 ml·min−1·kg−1; and 89 min−1 vs. 88 mi...","PeriodicalId":403174,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15438629709512085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Ten able bodied subjects (AB) volunteered to be tested with a Respond II neuromuscular stimulator applied to the lower extremities during submaximal arm crank exercise (ACE) to determine its effect on heart rate (min−1) and VO2 in ml·min−1 ·kg−1. One to two hours after a maximal ACE test, subjects performed four 9‐minute submaximal bouts of ACE; two at 25% and two at 70% of VO2peak. Each work rate was performed with and without, a randomly ordered, electrical stimulation (ES) of the quadriceps and hamstring muscle groups respectively. Electrical stimulation intensity was determined by a subject's maximal tolerance. Data, from four submaximum tests were analyzed with a two 2×2 repeated measures analysis of variance. The main effects were work rate (25% VO2peak and 70% VO2peak) and electrical stimulation (STIM) no stimulation (NOSTIM). No statistical differences was found between the STIM and NOSTIM in VO2 or heart rate at either 25% VO2peak (11.0 ml·min−1·kg−1 vs. 11.2 ml·min−1·kg−1; and 89 min−1 vs. 88 mi...
健全人在有或没有腿部电刺激时手臂转动时的摄氧量
10名身体健全的受试者(AB)自愿接受了在次最大臂曲柄运动(ACE)期间应用于下肢的Respond II神经肌肉刺激器的测试,以确定其对心率(min - 1)和VO2 (ml·min - 1·kg - 1)的影响。最大ACE测试后1 - 2小时,受试者进行4次9分钟的次最大ACE测试;两个是25%,两个是70%。每个工作速率分别在有或没有随机顺序的四头肌和腘绳肌群电刺激(ES)的情况下进行。电刺激强度由受试者的最大耐受性决定。来自四个次最大值试验的数据用两次2×2重复测量方差分析进行分析。主要效果为工作效率(25% VO2peak和70% VO2peak)和电刺激(STIM)和无刺激(NOSTIM)。在25% VO2峰值时,STIM组和NOSTIM组的VO2或心率均无统计学差异(11.0 ml·min−1·kg−1 vs. 11.2 ml·min−1·kg−1;89 min−1 vs. 88 mi…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信