Refuting Gregory Clark's Chauvinist Development Theory

Hak Choi
{"title":"Refuting Gregory Clark's Chauvinist Development Theory","authors":"Hak Choi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2580751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper refutes Gregory Clark’s chauvinist view that European countries are superior to the Asian ones, because they have been so. This paper proves that Clark’s empirical result is merely a movement along an isoquant with no implication on productivity. Then, this paper works out a similar relation to show that Asian countries can also be superior to the European ones, by the same Clark standard.","PeriodicalId":413603,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Europe & Eurasia (Development) (Topic)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Europe & Eurasia (Development) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2580751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper refutes Gregory Clark’s chauvinist view that European countries are superior to the Asian ones, because they have been so. This paper proves that Clark’s empirical result is merely a movement along an isoquant with no implication on productivity. Then, this paper works out a similar relation to show that Asian countries can also be superior to the European ones, by the same Clark standard.
反驳格雷戈里·克拉克的沙文主义发展理论
本文驳斥了格雷戈里·克拉克的沙文主义观点,即欧洲国家比亚洲国家优越,因为它们一直如此。本文证明,克拉克的实证结果只是沿着等量线的运动,对生产率没有任何影响。然后,本文推导出一个类似的关系,表明在同样的克拉克标准下,亚洲国家也可以优于欧洲国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信