Legal Implications for Regulating Investigation Authority in Accident Cases at Railroad Crossings

Erifendi Churniawan, U. Handoko, Ainun Fikria
{"title":"Legal Implications for Regulating Investigation Authority in Accident Cases at Railroad Crossings","authors":"Erifendi Churniawan, U. Handoko, Ainun Fikria","doi":"10.29303/ULREV.V5I2.174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to find out the legal implications of regulating the investigative authority in cases of accidents at railroad crossings. The research method used in this study is normative juridical research using a statutory approach, and a conceptual approach. The results obtained from this study are the implications arising from different provisions of Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation, and Law Number 23 of 2007 concerning Railways is that there is a tug of war on the authority of investigation between related agencies, namely Police Investigators and Railway PPNS. The tug-of-war of this investigative authority resulted in a conflict of investigative authority, where Police investigators conducted investigations based on the provisions of the Criminal Code, while the Railway PPNS conducted investigations based on the provisions of Law Number 23 of 2007 concerning Railways.","PeriodicalId":406021,"journal":{"name":"Unram Law Review","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unram Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/ULREV.V5I2.174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out the legal implications of regulating the investigative authority in cases of accidents at railroad crossings. The research method used in this study is normative juridical research using a statutory approach, and a conceptual approach. The results obtained from this study are the implications arising from different provisions of Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation, and Law Number 23 of 2007 concerning Railways is that there is a tug of war on the authority of investigation between related agencies, namely Police Investigators and Railway PPNS. The tug-of-war of this investigative authority resulted in a conflict of investigative authority, where Police investigators conducted investigations based on the provisions of the Criminal Code, while the Railway PPNS conducted investigations based on the provisions of Law Number 23 of 2007 concerning Railways.
规管铁路道口事故调查权限的法律影响
本研究的目的在于找出规范铁路道口事故调查权限的法律含义。本研究使用的研究方法是使用法定方法和概念方法进行规范性法律研究。本研究的结果是2009年关于道路交通和运输的第22号法律的不同规定所产生的影响,而2007年关于铁路的第23号法律是相关机构,即警察调查人员和铁路PPNS之间的调查权威拉锯战。这一调查权力的拉锯战导致了调查权力的冲突,警方调查人员根据《刑法》的规定进行调查,而铁路警察根据2007年第23号关于铁路的法律的规定进行调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信