On Classical Music Competitions

Glen Kwok, C. Dromey
{"title":"On Classical Music Competitions","authors":"Glen Kwok, C. Dromey","doi":"10.4324/9781315471099-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Competitions have long been a mainstay for classical musicians of all ages and proficiencies: emerging and established, amateur and professional, solo and ensemble. By enabling musicians to judge their level of performance against fellow performers on local, regional, national, or international stages, competitions represent more than the act of competing alone: they are also a vital means for classical musicians to promote themselves, to gain recognition, and, potentially, to launch their careers. Yet, as competitions have multiplied and diversified, particularly over the last half-century, questions surrounding their viability and legitimacy have gradually grown louder. The global financial crisis has jeopardised economic support for the arts and caused several competitions to close, sometimes after decades of operation, for example Paris’s quadrennial Rostropovich Cello Competition (1977–2009). Nevertheless, it is encouraging that most established competitions continue and, as we shall see, that new competitions are continuing to appear. \n \nThis chapter charts the mechanisms and dynamics of how classical music competitions operate. In so doing, it also addresses certain fundamental and topical questions that aspiring musicians, professionals working in the competition world, and critics of competitions will surely recognise given their relevance to musical life today: How do competitions vary? What purpose are they intended to serve? What are their benefits and, indeed, their drawbacks? The chapter falls into four related sections: a brief historical overview of competitive music-making, providing context for how and why classical music competitions proliferated in the post-war era; a more substantial chronicle of today’s scene, with a practical focus on different types of competitions in which musicians of international standing compete today; and a two-part appraisal of competitions’ efforts to innovate, examined in light of the complex, sometimes controversial issues, such as bias and musical judgement, these events provoke.","PeriodicalId":358965,"journal":{"name":"The Classical Music Industry","volume":"107 1-2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Classical Music Industry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315471099-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Competitions have long been a mainstay for classical musicians of all ages and proficiencies: emerging and established, amateur and professional, solo and ensemble. By enabling musicians to judge their level of performance against fellow performers on local, regional, national, or international stages, competitions represent more than the act of competing alone: they are also a vital means for classical musicians to promote themselves, to gain recognition, and, potentially, to launch their careers. Yet, as competitions have multiplied and diversified, particularly over the last half-century, questions surrounding their viability and legitimacy have gradually grown louder. The global financial crisis has jeopardised economic support for the arts and caused several competitions to close, sometimes after decades of operation, for example Paris’s quadrennial Rostropovich Cello Competition (1977–2009). Nevertheless, it is encouraging that most established competitions continue and, as we shall see, that new competitions are continuing to appear. This chapter charts the mechanisms and dynamics of how classical music competitions operate. In so doing, it also addresses certain fundamental and topical questions that aspiring musicians, professionals working in the competition world, and critics of competitions will surely recognise given their relevance to musical life today: How do competitions vary? What purpose are they intended to serve? What are their benefits and, indeed, their drawbacks? The chapter falls into four related sections: a brief historical overview of competitive music-making, providing context for how and why classical music competitions proliferated in the post-war era; a more substantial chronicle of today’s scene, with a practical focus on different types of competitions in which musicians of international standing compete today; and a two-part appraisal of competitions’ efforts to innovate, examined in light of the complex, sometimes controversial issues, such as bias and musical judgement, these events provoke.
关于古典音乐比赛
长期以来,比赛一直是所有年龄和熟练程度的古典音乐家的支柱:新兴的和成熟的,业余的和专业的,独奏的和合奏的。通过让音乐家们在当地、地区、国家或国际舞台上与其他表演者进行比较,判断自己的表演水平,比赛不仅仅是一种竞争行为:它们也是古典音乐家们提升自己、获得认可,并有可能启动他们职业生涯的重要手段。然而,随着竞争的增加和多样化,尤其是在过去的半个世纪里,围绕竞争的可行性和合法性的问题逐渐变得更加响亮。全球金融危机危及了对艺术的经济支持,并导致一些比赛关闭,有时是在几十年的运营之后,例如巴黎四年一度的罗斯特罗波维奇大提琴比赛(1977-2009)。然而,令人鼓舞的是,大多数已确立的竞争仍在继续,而且我们将看到,新的竞争也在继续出现。本章描绘了古典音乐比赛运作的机制和动态。在这样做的过程中,它也解决了一些基本的和热门的问题,这些问题是有抱负的音乐家、在竞争领域工作的专业人士和竞争评论家肯定会认识到的,因为它们与今天的音乐生活有关:竞争是如何变化的?它们的目的是什么?它们的优点和缺点是什么?本章分为四个相关部分:竞争音乐制作的简要历史概述,提供战后古典音乐比赛如何以及为什么激增的背景;一个更实质性的编年史的今天的场景,与实际的重点不同类型的比赛,音乐家的国际地位的竞争今天;对比赛的创新努力进行了分两部分的评估,根据这些事件引发的复杂的、有时是有争议的问题(如偏见和音乐判断)进行了检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信