{"title":"Uneasy or Accommodating Bedfellows? Common Law and Statute in Employment Regulation","authors":"J. Riley","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2356032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2005, Professor Phillipa Weeks published an insightful chapter entitled ‘Employment Law – A Test of Coherence Between Statute and Common Law’ in S Corcoran and S Bottomley (eds) Interpreting Statutes. That chapter examined the emergence, development and ultimate emasculation of an implied term of trust and confidence in employment, as a consequence of the interaction of judicial reasoning and legislative intervention. At the time, Professor Weeks bemoaned the ‘dismal state’ of Australian common law, and proposed a solution to the apparent incoherence and doctrinal imperfection in the law. This address will pick up the story where Professor Weeks left off, by considering the influence of developments – judicial and statutory – since publication of this important piece, and will revisit possible solutions in the light of those developments.","PeriodicalId":358833,"journal":{"name":"University of Sydney Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"231 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Sydney Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2356032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In 2005, Professor Phillipa Weeks published an insightful chapter entitled ‘Employment Law – A Test of Coherence Between Statute and Common Law’ in S Corcoran and S Bottomley (eds) Interpreting Statutes. That chapter examined the emergence, development and ultimate emasculation of an implied term of trust and confidence in employment, as a consequence of the interaction of judicial reasoning and legislative intervention. At the time, Professor Weeks bemoaned the ‘dismal state’ of Australian common law, and proposed a solution to the apparent incoherence and doctrinal imperfection in the law. This address will pick up the story where Professor Weeks left off, by considering the influence of developments – judicial and statutory – since publication of this important piece, and will revisit possible solutions in the light of those developments.
2005年,Phillipa Weeks教授在S Corcoran and S Bottomley(主编)《解释成文法》中发表了一篇名为“雇佣法-成文法与普通法一致性的测试”的深刻见解章节。该章审查了作为司法推理和立法干预相互作用的结果,就业中隐含的信任和信心条件的出现、发展和最终的削弱。当时,威克斯教授哀叹澳大利亚普通法的“惨淡状态”,并提出了一个解决方案,以解决法律中明显的不连贯和教义上的不完善。这次讲话将继续威克斯教授的故事,考虑自这篇重要文章发表以来司法和法律发展的影响,并将根据这些发展重新审视可能的解决办法。