Towards a Benchmark for Fact Checking with Knowledge Bases

Viet-Phi Huynh, Paolo Papotti
{"title":"Towards a Benchmark for Fact Checking with Knowledge Bases","authors":"Viet-Phi Huynh, Paolo Papotti","doi":"10.1145/3184558.3191616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fact checking is the task of determining if a given claim holds. Several algorithms have been developed to check facts with reference information in the form of knowledge bases. While individual algorithms have been experimentally evaluated, we provide a first publicly available benchmark evaluating fact checking implementations across a range of assumptions about the properties of the facts and the reference data. We used our benchmark to compare algorithms designed on different principles and assumptions, as well as algorithms that can solve similar tasks developed in closely related communities. Our evaluation provided us with a number of new insights concerning the factors that impact the performance of the different methods.","PeriodicalId":235572,"journal":{"name":"Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3191616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Fact checking is the task of determining if a given claim holds. Several algorithms have been developed to check facts with reference information in the form of knowledge bases. While individual algorithms have been experimentally evaluated, we provide a first publicly available benchmark evaluating fact checking implementations across a range of assumptions about the properties of the facts and the reference data. We used our benchmark to compare algorithms designed on different principles and assumptions, as well as algorithms that can solve similar tasks developed in closely related communities. Our evaluation provided us with a number of new insights concerning the factors that impact the performance of the different methods.
事实核查的任务是确定一个给定的主张是否成立。已经开发了几种算法,以知识库的形式使用参考信息来检查事实。虽然已经对单个算法进行了实验评估,但我们提供了第一个公开可用的基准,该基准评估了关于事实属性和参考数据的一系列假设的事实检查实现。我们使用基准来比较基于不同原则和假设设计的算法,以及在密切相关的社区中开发的可以解决类似任务的算法。我们的评估为我们提供了许多关于影响不同方法性能的因素的新见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信