Atualização das estimativas da magnitude do aborto induzido, taxas por mil mulheres e razões por 100 nascimentos vivos do aborto induzido por faixa etária e grandes regiões. Brasil, 1995 a 2013

Mario Francisco Giani Monteiro , Leila Adesse , Jefferson Drezett
{"title":"Atualização das estimativas da magnitude do aborto induzido, taxas por mil mulheres e razões por 100 nascimentos vivos do aborto induzido por faixa etária e grandes regiões. Brasil, 1995 a 2013","authors":"Mario Francisco Giani Monteiro ,&nbsp;Leila Adesse ,&nbsp;Jefferson Drezett","doi":"10.1016/j.recli.2015.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Estimates of induced abortion in Brazil were inaccurate until the early 1990, varying between 300 million and 3.3 million clandestine abortions. In 2000, were estimated 22.3 abortions induced by 1000 women in Brazil, using the methodology proposed by the Alan Guttmacher Institute.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Update estimates of induced abortion in Brazil during the period of 1995 to 2013.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The primary data source was the number of hospitalizations for abortion registered in the Hospital Information System of the Unified Health System, disaggregated by region and age group. The number of induced abortions has been estimated by interval upper limit, multiplying by five the number of hospitalizations, and by lower bound, by multiplying by four the number of hospitalizations. It was considered under percentage record of 12.5% and the proportion of miscarriages of 25%.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Between 1995 and 2013, the hospitalizations of women from 10 to 49 years by complications from abortion decreased by 27% and the estimate of the annual number of induced abortions declined 26%. It was observed decline of upper limit of induced abortion ratio of 27/1000 women for 16/1000. The same was noticed for the lower bound of 21/12/1000 to 1000. In the two regions with the highest number of hospitalizations for complications of abortion, Northeast and Southeast, showed significant reduction in the number of cases of 35% and 27% respectively. Found a great reduction in the risk of induced abortion, of 43% between 15 and 29 years, 49% between 20 and 29 years old, 26% between 30 and 39 years and 50% of 40 to 49 years. The estimation of induced abortions decreased from 864,628 to 687,347 (lower limit), and from 1,086,708 to 865,160 (upper limit).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Both the reason of abortion per 100 live births and the rate of induced abortions per thousand women aged 15 to 49 years in Brazil showed decrease in the studied period.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101073,"journal":{"name":"Reprodu??o & Climatério","volume":"30 1","pages":"Pages 11-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.recli.2015.05.003","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reprodu??o & Climatério","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413208715000254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Introduction

Estimates of induced abortion in Brazil were inaccurate until the early 1990, varying between 300 million and 3.3 million clandestine abortions. In 2000, were estimated 22.3 abortions induced by 1000 women in Brazil, using the methodology proposed by the Alan Guttmacher Institute.

Objective

Update estimates of induced abortion in Brazil during the period of 1995 to 2013.

Method

The primary data source was the number of hospitalizations for abortion registered in the Hospital Information System of the Unified Health System, disaggregated by region and age group. The number of induced abortions has been estimated by interval upper limit, multiplying by five the number of hospitalizations, and by lower bound, by multiplying by four the number of hospitalizations. It was considered under percentage record of 12.5% and the proportion of miscarriages of 25%.

Results

Between 1995 and 2013, the hospitalizations of women from 10 to 49 years by complications from abortion decreased by 27% and the estimate of the annual number of induced abortions declined 26%. It was observed decline of upper limit of induced abortion ratio of 27/1000 women for 16/1000. The same was noticed for the lower bound of 21/12/1000 to 1000. In the two regions with the highest number of hospitalizations for complications of abortion, Northeast and Southeast, showed significant reduction in the number of cases of 35% and 27% respectively. Found a great reduction in the risk of induced abortion, of 43% between 15 and 29 years, 49% between 20 and 29 years old, 26% between 30 and 39 years and 50% of 40 to 49 years. The estimation of induced abortions decreased from 864,628 to 687,347 (lower limit), and from 1,086,708 to 865,160 (upper limit).

Conclusion

Both the reason of abortion per 100 live births and the rate of induced abortions per thousand women aged 15 to 49 years in Brazil showed decrease in the studied period.

按年龄组和主要区域分列的人工流产规模、每千名妇女的比率和每100名活产人工流产的比率的最新估计数。巴西,1995年至2013年
直到1990年代初,巴西对人工流产的估计是不准确的,秘密流产在3亿到330万之间。根据阿兰古特马赫研究所提出的方法,2000年巴西估计有1000名妇女进行了22.3次堕胎。目的更新1995 - 2013年巴西人工流产的统计数据。方法主要数据来源为全国统一卫生系统医院信息系统登记的流产住院人数,按地区、年龄组分类。人工流产的数量是用区间上限乘以住院人数5和区间下限乘以住院人数4来估计的。被认为低于12.5%的百分比记录和25%的流产比例。结果1995 - 2013年,10 - 49岁妇女因流产并发症住院的人数下降了27%,年人工流产估计人数下降了26%。16/1000妇女的人工流产率上限下降,为27/1000。对于21/12/1000到1000的下界也有同样的注意。在因流产并发症住院人数最多的两个地区,即东北部和东南部,病例数分别显著减少了35%和27%。发现人工流产的风险在15 - 29岁之间降低43%,在20 - 29岁之间降低49%,在30 - 39岁之间降低26%,在40 - 49岁之间降低50%。人工流产的估计从864,628例下降到687,347例(下限),从1,086,708例下降到865,160例(上限)。结论研究期间,巴西15 ~ 49岁妇女每100例活产的流产原因和每千名妇女的人工流产率均有所下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信