Exploring Cross-Media Audience Practices in Two Cases of Public Service Media in Estonia and Finland

Alessandro Nanì, P. Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt
{"title":"Exploring Cross-Media Audience Practices in Two Cases of Public Service Media in Estonia and Finland","authors":"Alessandro Nanì, P. Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt","doi":"10.1515/bsmr-2017-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Stemming from the concept of active audiences and from Henry Jenkins’ (2006) idea of participatory culture as the driving force behind the transformation of public service broadcasting into agencies of public service media (Bardoel, Ferrell Lowe 2007), this empirical study explores the attitude and behaviour of the audiences of two crossmedia projects, produced by the public service media of Finland (YLE) and Estonia (ERR). This empirical study aims to explore the behaviour, wants and needs of the audiences of cross-media productions and to shed some light on the conditions that support the dynamic switching of the engagement with cross-media. The study’s results suggest that audiences are neither passive nor active, but switch from one mode to another. The findings demonstrate that audience dynamism is circumstantial and cannot be assumed. Thus, thinking about active audiences and participation as the lymph of public service media becomes problematic, especially when broadcasters seek generalised production practices. This work demonstrates how television networks in general cannot be participatory, and instead, how cross-media can work as a vehicle of micro participation through small acts of audience engagement (Kleut et al. 2017).","PeriodicalId":253522,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Screen Media Review","volume":"27 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Screen Media Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bsmr-2017-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Stemming from the concept of active audiences and from Henry Jenkins’ (2006) idea of participatory culture as the driving force behind the transformation of public service broadcasting into agencies of public service media (Bardoel, Ferrell Lowe 2007), this empirical study explores the attitude and behaviour of the audiences of two crossmedia projects, produced by the public service media of Finland (YLE) and Estonia (ERR). This empirical study aims to explore the behaviour, wants and needs of the audiences of cross-media productions and to shed some light on the conditions that support the dynamic switching of the engagement with cross-media. The study’s results suggest that audiences are neither passive nor active, but switch from one mode to another. The findings demonstrate that audience dynamism is circumstantial and cannot be assumed. Thus, thinking about active audiences and participation as the lymph of public service media becomes problematic, especially when broadcasters seek generalised production practices. This work demonstrates how television networks in general cannot be participatory, and instead, how cross-media can work as a vehicle of micro participation through small acts of audience engagement (Kleut et al. 2017).
爱沙尼亚和芬兰公共服务媒体跨媒体受众实践探析
基于活跃观众的概念和Henry Jenkins(2006)的参与式文化是公共服务广播向公共服务媒体机构转变背后的驱动力的观点(Bardoel, Ferrell Lowe 2007),本实证研究探讨了芬兰(YLE)和爱沙尼亚(ERR)公共服务媒体制作的两个跨媒体项目的观众态度和行为。本实证研究旨在探讨跨媒体制作的观众的行为、欲望和需求,并揭示支持跨媒体参与动态切换的条件。研究结果表明,观众既不是被动的,也不是主动的,而是从一种模式切换到另一种模式。研究结果表明,观众的活力是间接的,不能假设。因此,将活跃的观众和参与视为公共服务媒体的淋巴是有问题的,特别是当广播公司寻求普遍的制作实践时。这项工作证明了电视网络通常不能参与,相反,跨媒体如何通过观众参与的小行为作为微参与的载体(Kleut et al. 2017)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信