Community, consensus, coercion, control: cs*w or how policy mediates mass participation

Travis Kriplean, Ivan Beschastnikh, David W. Mcdonald, Scott A. Golder
{"title":"Community, consensus, coercion, control: cs*w or how policy mediates mass participation","authors":"Travis Kriplean, Ivan Beschastnikh, David W. Mcdonald, Scott A. Golder","doi":"10.1145/1316624.1316648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When large groups cooperate, issues of conflict and control surface because of differences in perspective. Managing such diverse views is a persistent problem in cooperative group work. The Wikipedian community has responded with an evolving body of policies that provide shared principles, processes, and strategies for collaboration. We employ a grounded approach to study a sample of active talk pages and examine how policies are employed as contributors work towards consensus. Although policies help build a stronger community, we find that ambiguities in policies give rise to power plays. This lens demonstrates that support for mass collaboration must take into account policy and power.","PeriodicalId":445069,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2007 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work","volume":"23 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"142","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2007 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1316624.1316648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 142

Abstract

When large groups cooperate, issues of conflict and control surface because of differences in perspective. Managing such diverse views is a persistent problem in cooperative group work. The Wikipedian community has responded with an evolving body of policies that provide shared principles, processes, and strategies for collaboration. We employ a grounded approach to study a sample of active talk pages and examine how policies are employed as contributors work towards consensus. Although policies help build a stronger community, we find that ambiguities in policies give rise to power plays. This lens demonstrates that support for mass collaboration must take into account policy and power.
社区、共识、强制、控制:政策如何调解大众参与
当大群体合作时,由于观点的不同,冲突和控制问题就会浮出水面。管理这种不同的观点是合作小组工作中一个长期存在的问题。维基人社区以一系列不断发展的政策作为回应,这些政策为协作提供了共享的原则、流程和策略。我们采用了一种有根据的方法来研究活跃讨论页的样本,并检查政策是如何被采用的,因为贡献者致力于达成共识。虽然政策有助于建立一个更强大的社区,但我们发现政策的模糊性会引发权力博弈。这一视角表明,支持大规模协作必须考虑到政策和权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信