Prokopovich, Pravda and Proof: Some Myths about Pravda Voli Monarshei

A. Lentin
{"title":"Prokopovich, Pravda and Proof: Some Myths about Pravda Voli Monarshei","authors":"A. Lentin","doi":"10.15170/spmnnv.2009.05.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Revisiting some conclusions advanced in his 1996 edition of Pravda Voli Monarshei, the author first considers the meaning of 'Pravda' in the title of the work. He then reconsiders the doubts as to its authorship raised by James Cracraft in 1981 in his influential article 'Did Feofan Prokopovich really write Pravda Voli Monarshei?' (Slavic Review, vol. 40, No. 2, pp.173-93). Finally he examines the accepted belief, now current for almost a century, that Hobbes is a source of Pravda Voli Monarshei.","PeriodicalId":391066,"journal":{"name":"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis","volume":"82 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15170/spmnnv.2009.05.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Revisiting some conclusions advanced in his 1996 edition of Pravda Voli Monarshei, the author first considers the meaning of 'Pravda' in the title of the work. He then reconsiders the doubts as to its authorship raised by James Cracraft in 1981 in his influential article 'Did Feofan Prokopovich really write Pravda Voli Monarshei?' (Slavic Review, vol. 40, No. 2, pp.173-93). Finally he examines the accepted belief, now current for almost a century, that Hobbes is a source of Pravda Voli Monarshei.
Prokopovich,真理报和证明:关于《君主真理报》的一些神话
在回顾1996年出版的《真理报》中提出的一些结论时,作者首先考虑了作品标题中“真理报”的含义。然后,他重新考虑了1981年詹姆斯·克拉克拉夫特(James craft)在其颇具影响力的文章《普罗科波维奇(Feofan Prokopovich)真的是《真理报》的作者吗?》(《斯拉夫评论》第40卷第2期,第173—93页)。最后,他考察了一个公认的观点,即霍布斯是《君主真理报》的来源,这个观点已经流行了将近一个世纪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信