Party Acts` Role and Significance in the Prosecutor's Supervision Implementation in the USSR in the 1920s-1930s

O. Galkin
{"title":"Party Acts` Role and Significance in the Prosecutor's Supervision Implementation in the USSR in the 1920s-1930s","authors":"O. Galkin","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2021.3.13.","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of the article is the theoretical concepts of the Soviet prosecutor's office regulatory controls and the historical and legal practice of its activities. The chronological framework of the study covers the period from the restoration of the prosecutor's office in 1922 to the completion of the main stage of the prosecutor's offices system reforming, which took place in the 1930s. Attention is focused on the problems of the Soviet prosecutor's office activities regulating by party acts. On the basis of modern historical and legal concepts, published archival documents and materials of the Soviet legal periodical press and scientific literature, the author studies the mechanisms of interaction between the Russian (later – All-Union) Communist Party and the prosecutor's office. The author raises the debatable issue of recognizing the status of the Soviet law source for party acts, and gives additional justifications of their legal nature based on the sources analysis covering the prosecutor's activity. The article analyzes both the practical aspects of the Soviet prosecutor's office work, and their theoretical understanding by contemporary authors. The author substantiates the importance of party acts in consolidating the organizational foundations of the Soviet prosecutor's office and the implementation of prosecutor's supervision, summarizes the range of issues of the prosecutor's office, which were reflected in the decisions taken by the party, confirming the status of the latter as a subject of law-making activity.","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"4 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prologue: Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2021.3.13.","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of the article is the theoretical concepts of the Soviet prosecutor's office regulatory controls and the historical and legal practice of its activities. The chronological framework of the study covers the period from the restoration of the prosecutor's office in 1922 to the completion of the main stage of the prosecutor's offices system reforming, which took place in the 1930s. Attention is focused on the problems of the Soviet prosecutor's office activities regulating by party acts. On the basis of modern historical and legal concepts, published archival documents and materials of the Soviet legal periodical press and scientific literature, the author studies the mechanisms of interaction between the Russian (later – All-Union) Communist Party and the prosecutor's office. The author raises the debatable issue of recognizing the status of the Soviet law source for party acts, and gives additional justifications of their legal nature based on the sources analysis covering the prosecutor's activity. The article analyzes both the practical aspects of the Soviet prosecutor's office work, and their theoretical understanding by contemporary authors. The author substantiates the importance of party acts in consolidating the organizational foundations of the Soviet prosecutor's office and the implementation of prosecutor's supervision, summarizes the range of issues of the prosecutor's office, which were reflected in the decisions taken by the party, confirming the status of the latter as a subject of law-making activity.
20世纪20 - 30年代苏联检察监督实施中的党法作用与意义
本文的主题是苏联检察机关规制控制的理论概念及其活动的历史和法律实践。这项研究的时间框架涵盖了从1922年恢复检察官办公室到20世纪30年代完成检察官办公室制度改革的主要阶段这一时期。对苏联检察机关受党法规制的问题进行了研究。本文以近代历史和法律观念为基础,以苏联法律期刊出版的档案文件和资料以及科学文献为基础,对俄罗斯共产党(后苏联)与检察机关的互动机制进行了研究。发件人提出了一个有争议的问题,即承认政党行为的苏联法律来源的地位,并根据涉及检察官活动的来源分析,对其法律性质提出了额外的理由。文章分析了苏联检察机关工作的实践方面,以及当代作者对苏联检察机关工作的理论认识。作者证实了党的行为在巩固苏联检察院的组织基础和实施检察官监督方面的重要性,总结了检察院的一系列问题,这些问题反映在党的决定中,确认了后者作为立法活动主体的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信