A New Test for the Advanced Diagnosis of Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy with Concomitant Intrasubstance Tear: Failure to Resist Extension Effort (the Free Test).

IF 1.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Cristóbal Greene, Guillermo Droppelmann, Nicolás García, Carlos Jorquera, Arturo Verdugo
{"title":"A New Test for the Advanced Diagnosis of Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy with Concomitant Intrasubstance Tear: Failure to Resist Extension Effort (the Free Test).","authors":"Cristóbal Greene,&nbsp;Guillermo Droppelmann,&nbsp;Nicolás García,&nbsp;Carlos Jorquera,&nbsp;Arturo Verdugo","doi":"10.2147/ORR.S364050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) is one of the most common causes of musculoskeletal pain. The diagnosis is based on the clinical history and different physical maneuvers. Ultrasound (US) is a complementary diagnostic method to detect degenerative tendon changes and intrasubstance tears (IST). To date, there is no available physical maneuver to identify an IST in patients with LET.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an index test to detect an IST confirmed by ultrasound in patients with LET.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A diagnostic retrospective study was performed. Patients who presented medical records with LET were recruited. Two orthopaedic surgeons developed the physical maneuver. The index test was considered positive when the position failed to resist the wrist extension maximum effort. Clinical findings were associated with confirmation of IST by US. Data were calculated using diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity with 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-nine patients (39 elbows) were analyzed, 25 (64%) women and 14 (36%) men, with an average age of 47.7 years. The index test's sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.67-0.96). Accuracy was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.64-0.91), and the specificity was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.31-0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The index test presented very good sensitivity and good accuracy in patients with LET with US diagnostic confirmation of IST.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Diagnostic study, Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":19608,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","volume":"14 ","pages":"495-503"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e2/c5/orr-14-495.PMC9809378.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S364050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) is one of the most common causes of musculoskeletal pain. The diagnosis is based on the clinical history and different physical maneuvers. Ultrasound (US) is a complementary diagnostic method to detect degenerative tendon changes and intrasubstance tears (IST). To date, there is no available physical maneuver to identify an IST in patients with LET.

Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an index test to detect an IST confirmed by ultrasound in patients with LET.

Methods: A diagnostic retrospective study was performed. Patients who presented medical records with LET were recruited. Two orthopaedic surgeons developed the physical maneuver. The index test was considered positive when the position failed to resist the wrist extension maximum effort. Clinical findings were associated with confirmation of IST by US. Data were calculated using diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Thirty-nine patients (39 elbows) were analyzed, 25 (64%) women and 14 (36%) men, with an average age of 47.7 years. The index test's sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.67-0.96). Accuracy was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.64-0.91), and the specificity was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.31-0.89).

Conclusion: The index test presented very good sensitivity and good accuracy in patients with LET with US diagnostic confirmation of IST.

Level of evidence: Diagnostic study, Level III.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肘关节外侧肌腱病变伴物内撕裂的一种新的高级诊断方法:不能抵抗伸展力(自由试验)。
背景:侧肘肌腱病(LET)是肌肉骨骼疼痛最常见的原因之一。诊断是基于临床病史和不同的身体动作。超声(US)是一种辅助诊断方法来检测退行性肌腱改变和物质内撕裂(IST)。到目前为止,还没有可用的物理方法来确定LET患者的IST。目的:评价超声检查对LET患者IST的诊断准确性。方法:进行诊断性回顾性研究。研究人员招募了有LET病历的患者。两位整形外科医生发明了这种物理手法。当体位不能抵抗手腕伸展的最大努力时,指数测试被认为是阳性的。临床表现与US证实的IST相关。数据的计算采用诊断准确性、敏感性和特异性,置信区间为95%。结果:39例患者(39肘部),女性25例(64%),男性14例(36%),平均年龄47.7岁。该指标试验的敏感性为0.86 (95% CI, 0.67 ~ 0.96)。准确度为0.79 (95% CI, 0.64-0.91),特异性为0.64 (95% CI, 0.31-0.89)。结论:指标试验对经US诊断为IST的LET患者具有很好的敏感性和准确性。证据等级:诊断性研究,III级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopedic Research and Reviews
Orthopedic Research and Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Research and Reviews is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the patho-physiology of the musculoskeletal system, trauma, surgery and other corrective interventions to restore mobility and function. Advances in new technologies, materials, techniques and pharmacological agents will be particularly welcome. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Patho-physiology and bioengineering, Technologies and materials science, Surgical techniques, including robotics, Trauma management and care, Treatment including pharmacological and non-pharmacological, Rehabilitation and Multidisciplinarian care approaches, Patient quality of life, satisfaction and preference, Health economic evaluations. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science and technology, clinical studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信