Food production and resource use of urban farms and gardens: a five-country study

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Erica Dorr, Jason K. Hawes, Benjamin Goldstein, Agnès Fargue-Lelièvre, Runrid Fox-Kämper, Kathrin Specht, Konstancja Fedeńczak, Silvio Caputo, Nevin Cohen, Lidia Poniży, Victoria Schoen, Tomasz Górecki, Joshua P. Newell, Liliane Jean-Soro, Baptiste Grard
{"title":"Food production and resource use of urban farms and gardens: a five-country study","authors":"Erica Dorr,&nbsp;Jason K. Hawes,&nbsp;Benjamin Goldstein,&nbsp;Agnès Fargue-Lelièvre,&nbsp;Runrid Fox-Kämper,&nbsp;Kathrin Specht,&nbsp;Konstancja Fedeńczak,&nbsp;Silvio Caputo,&nbsp;Nevin Cohen,&nbsp;Lidia Poniży,&nbsp;Victoria Schoen,&nbsp;Tomasz Górecki,&nbsp;Joshua P. Newell,&nbsp;Liliane Jean-Soro,&nbsp;Baptiste Grard","doi":"10.1007/s13593-022-00859-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is a lack of data on resources used and food produced at urban farms. This hampers attempts to quantify the environmental impacts of urban agriculture or craft policies for sustainable food production in cities. To address this gap, we used a citizen science approach to collect data from 72 urban agriculture sites, representing three types of spaces (urban farms, collective gardens, individual gardens), in five countries (France, Germany, Poland, United Kingdom, and United States). We answered three key questions about urban agriculture with this unprecedented dataset: (1) What are its land, water, nutrient, and energy demands? (2) How productive is it relative to conventional agriculture and across types of farms? and (3) What are its contributions to local biodiversity? We found that participant farms used dozens of inputs, most of which were organic (e.g., manure for fertilizers). Farms required on average 71.6 L of irrigation water, 5.5 L of compost, and 0.53 m<sup>2</sup> of land per kilogram of harvested food. Irrigation was lower in individual gardens and higher in sites using drip irrigation. While extremely variable, yields at well-managed urban farms can exceed those of conventional counterparts. Although farm type did not predict yield, our cluster analysis demonstrated that individually managed leisure gardens had lower yields than other farms and gardens. Farms in our sample contributed significantly to local biodiversity, with an average of 20 different crops per farm not including ornamental plants. Aside from clarifying important trends in resource use at urban farms using a robust and open dataset, this study also raises numerous questions about how crop selection and growing practices influence the environmental impacts of growing food in cities. We conclude with a research agenda to tackle these and other pressing questions on resource use at urban farms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-022-00859-4.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-022-00859-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

There is a lack of data on resources used and food produced at urban farms. This hampers attempts to quantify the environmental impacts of urban agriculture or craft policies for sustainable food production in cities. To address this gap, we used a citizen science approach to collect data from 72 urban agriculture sites, representing three types of spaces (urban farms, collective gardens, individual gardens), in five countries (France, Germany, Poland, United Kingdom, and United States). We answered three key questions about urban agriculture with this unprecedented dataset: (1) What are its land, water, nutrient, and energy demands? (2) How productive is it relative to conventional agriculture and across types of farms? and (3) What are its contributions to local biodiversity? We found that participant farms used dozens of inputs, most of which were organic (e.g., manure for fertilizers). Farms required on average 71.6 L of irrigation water, 5.5 L of compost, and 0.53 m2 of land per kilogram of harvested food. Irrigation was lower in individual gardens and higher in sites using drip irrigation. While extremely variable, yields at well-managed urban farms can exceed those of conventional counterparts. Although farm type did not predict yield, our cluster analysis demonstrated that individually managed leisure gardens had lower yields than other farms and gardens. Farms in our sample contributed significantly to local biodiversity, with an average of 20 different crops per farm not including ornamental plants. Aside from clarifying important trends in resource use at urban farms using a robust and open dataset, this study also raises numerous questions about how crop selection and growing practices influence the environmental impacts of growing food in cities. We conclude with a research agenda to tackle these and other pressing questions on resource use at urban farms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

城市农场和花园的粮食生产和资源利用:一项五国研究
缺乏关于城市农场使用的资源和生产的食物的数据。这阻碍了量化城市农业对环境的影响或制定城市可持续粮食生产政策的努力。为了解决这一差距,我们使用公民科学方法收集了来自五个国家(法国、德国、波兰、英国和美国)72个城市农业站点的数据,这些站点代表了三种类型的空间(城市农场、集体花园、个人花园)。我们用这个前所未有的数据集回答了关于都市农业的三个关键问题:(1)它对土地、水、养分和能源的需求是什么?(2)与传统农业和不同类型的农场相比,它的生产力如何?(3)对当地生物多样性有何贡献?我们发现参与的农场使用了几十种投入物,其中大多数是有机的(例如,肥料中的粪便)。农场每收获一公斤粮食平均需要71.6升的灌溉用水、5.5升的堆肥和0.53平方米的土地。单个花园的灌溉较低,滴灌场地的灌溉较高。尽管变化很大,但管理良好的城市农场的产量可以超过传统农场。虽然农场类型不能预测产量,但我们的聚类分析表明,单独经营的休闲花园的产量低于其他农场和花园。我们样本中的农场对当地的生物多样性贡献很大,每个农场平均有20种不同的作物,不包括观赏植物。除了利用强大而开放的数据集阐明城市农场资源利用的重要趋势外,本研究还提出了许多关于作物选择和种植实践如何影响城市粮食种植对环境影响的问题。最后,我们提出了一项研究议程,以解决这些问题和其他有关城市农场资源利用的紧迫问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信