{"title":"Global vaccine inequities and multilateralism amid COVID-19: Reconnaissance of Global Health Diplomacy as a panacea?","authors":"Bawa Singh, Jaspal Kaur, Vijay Kumar Chattu","doi":"10.34172/hpp.2022.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has shown a crystal-clear warning that nobody will be safe until everybody is safe against the pandemic. However, how everyone is safe when the pandemic's fat tail risks have broken every nerve of the global economy and healthcare facilities, including vaccine equity. Vaccine inequity has become one of the critical factors for millions of new infections and deaths during this pandemic. Against the backdrop of exponentially growing infected cases of COVID-19 along with vaccine in-equity, this paper will examine how multilateralism could play its role in mitigating vaccine equity through Global Health Diplomacy (GHD). Second, given the most affected developing countries' lack of participation in multilateralism, could GHD be left as an option in the worst-case scenario?. <b>Methods:</b> In this narrative review, a literature search was conducted in all the popular databases, such as Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed and Google search engines for the keywords in the context of developing countries and the findings are discussed in detail. <b>Results:</b> In this multilateral world, the global governance institutions in health have been monopolized by the global North, leading to COVID-19 vaccine inequities. GHD aids health protection and public health and improves international relations. Besides, GHD facilitates a broad range of stakeholders' commitment to collaborate in improving healthcare, achieving fair outcomes, achieving equity, and reducing poverty. <b>Conclusion:</b> Vaccine inequity is a major challenge of the present scenario, and GHD has been partly successful in being a panacea for many countries in the global south.</p>","PeriodicalId":46588,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Perspectives","volume":"12 4","pages":"315-324"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9958236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.2022.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has shown a crystal-clear warning that nobody will be safe until everybody is safe against the pandemic. However, how everyone is safe when the pandemic's fat tail risks have broken every nerve of the global economy and healthcare facilities, including vaccine equity. Vaccine inequity has become one of the critical factors for millions of new infections and deaths during this pandemic. Against the backdrop of exponentially growing infected cases of COVID-19 along with vaccine in-equity, this paper will examine how multilateralism could play its role in mitigating vaccine equity through Global Health Diplomacy (GHD). Second, given the most affected developing countries' lack of participation in multilateralism, could GHD be left as an option in the worst-case scenario?. Methods: In this narrative review, a literature search was conducted in all the popular databases, such as Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed and Google search engines for the keywords in the context of developing countries and the findings are discussed in detail. Results: In this multilateral world, the global governance institutions in health have been monopolized by the global North, leading to COVID-19 vaccine inequities. GHD aids health protection and public health and improves international relations. Besides, GHD facilitates a broad range of stakeholders' commitment to collaborate in improving healthcare, achieving fair outcomes, achieving equity, and reducing poverty. Conclusion: Vaccine inequity is a major challenge of the present scenario, and GHD has been partly successful in being a panacea for many countries in the global south.
背景:正在进行的COVID-19大流行发出了一个非常明确的警告,即在所有人都能安全抵御大流行之前,没有人是安全的。然而,当大流行的肥尾风险打破了全球经济和卫生保健设施的每一根神经,包括疫苗公平,每个人都是安全的。疫苗不平等已成为本次大流行期间数百万新感染和死亡的关键因素之一。在COVID-19感染病例呈指数级增长以及疫苗公平的背景下,本文将研究多边主义如何通过全球卫生外交(GHD)在缓解疫苗公平方面发挥作用。其次,考虑到受影响最严重的发展中国家缺乏多边主义的参与,在最坏的情况下,GHD是否可以作为一种选择?方法:在这篇叙述性综述中,对所有流行的数据库,如Scopus、Web of Science、PubMed和Google搜索引擎,对发展中国家背景下的关键词进行文献检索,并对结果进行详细讨论。结果:在这个多边世界中,卫生领域的全球治理机构被全球北方垄断,导致COVID-19疫苗不平等。GHD有助于健康保护和公共卫生,并改善国际关系。此外,GHD促进广泛的利益攸关方承诺在改善医疗保健、实现公平成果、实现公平和减少贫困方面进行合作。结论:疫苗不平等是当前形势的一个主要挑战,而GHD已部分成功地成为全球南方许多国家的灵丹妙药。