The impact of small and asymptomatic intramural and subserosal fibroids on female fertility: a case-control study.

IF 8.3 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Valentina Bonanni, Marco Reschini, Irene La Vecchia, Marta Castiglioni, Ludovico Muzii, Paolo Vercellini, Edgardo Somigliana
{"title":"The impact of small and asymptomatic intramural and subserosal fibroids on female fertility: a case-control study.","authors":"Valentina Bonanni,&nbsp;Marco Reschini,&nbsp;Irene La Vecchia,&nbsp;Marta Castiglioni,&nbsp;Ludovico Muzii,&nbsp;Paolo Vercellini,&nbsp;Edgardo Somigliana","doi":"10.1093/hropen/hoac056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study question: </strong>Do small and asymptomatic intramural and subserosal uterine fibroids affect female fertility?</p><p><strong>Summary answer: </strong>Small and asymptomatic fibroids that do not encroach the endometrial cavity appear to not markedly affect female fertility.</p><p><strong>What is known already: </strong>The available evidence on uterine fibroids and fertility is limited. Most information has been obtained in IVF settings by comparing the success in women affected and not affected by fibroids. These studies have shown a detrimental effect of submucosal and possibly intramural fibroids. However, this study design provides information only on embryo implantation, not on female fertility in general.</p><p><strong>Study design size duration: </strong>A retrospective observational case-control study on 200 women whose partner was diagnosed with severe male infertility and 200 women with unexplained infertility was conducted. If the null hypothesis (that fibroids do not affect fertility) is valid, one would expect a similar prevalence of fibroids in the two study groups. Conversely, if fibroids do impact fertility, one would expect a higher prevalence among women with unexplained infertility. The study was carried out at the Infertility Unit of the Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico covering a 5-year period between January 2014 and June 2020.</p><p><strong>Participants/materials setting methods: </strong>We retrospectively recruited women seeking pregnancy whose partner was repeatedly documented to have a sperm concentration below 1 million/ml and matched them by age and study period to a group of women with unexplained infertility. The latter group of women was considered as a case group (infertile subjects), while the former group of women was considered as a control group (reflecting the general female population). Women with fibroids could be included in both study groups; only those with submucosal lesions were excluded.</p><p><strong>Main results and the role of chance: </strong>Fibroids were diagnosed in 31 women (16%) with unexplained infertility and in 32 women (16%) with severe male factor infertility. The adjusted odds ratio of carrying fibroids in women with unexplained infertility was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.52-1.58). Subgroup analyses according to number, dimension and location of fibroids failed to highlight an increased risk of infertility in any group.</p><p><strong>Limitations reasons for caution: </strong>This is a retrospective study and some inaccuracies in fibroids detection cannot be ruled out. Moreover, the relatively small sample size hampers robust subgroup analyses. Even though we excluded women with patent causes of infertility, some women with specific causes of infertility could have been included among controls (yet are expected to account for <10% of the group).</p><p><strong>Wider implications of the findings: </strong>This study suggests that small fibroids that do not encroach the endometrial cavity do not markedly affect female fertility. This information is clinically relevant when counseling infertile women with small fibroids and an otherwise unremarkable diagnostic work-up. Surgery may still be considered but only in selected cases.</p><p><strong>Study funding/competing interests: </strong>This study was partially funded by Italian Ministry of Health: current research IRCCS. E.S. reports grants from Ferring, grants and personal fees from Merck, and grants and personal fees from Theramex outside the submitted work. All the other authors do not have any competing interest to declare.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>N/A.</p>","PeriodicalId":73264,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction open","volume":"2023 1","pages":"hoac056"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/40/a9/hoac056.PMC9782921.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoac056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Study question: Do small and asymptomatic intramural and subserosal uterine fibroids affect female fertility?

Summary answer: Small and asymptomatic fibroids that do not encroach the endometrial cavity appear to not markedly affect female fertility.

What is known already: The available evidence on uterine fibroids and fertility is limited. Most information has been obtained in IVF settings by comparing the success in women affected and not affected by fibroids. These studies have shown a detrimental effect of submucosal and possibly intramural fibroids. However, this study design provides information only on embryo implantation, not on female fertility in general.

Study design size duration: A retrospective observational case-control study on 200 women whose partner was diagnosed with severe male infertility and 200 women with unexplained infertility was conducted. If the null hypothesis (that fibroids do not affect fertility) is valid, one would expect a similar prevalence of fibroids in the two study groups. Conversely, if fibroids do impact fertility, one would expect a higher prevalence among women with unexplained infertility. The study was carried out at the Infertility Unit of the Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico covering a 5-year period between January 2014 and June 2020.

Participants/materials setting methods: We retrospectively recruited women seeking pregnancy whose partner was repeatedly documented to have a sperm concentration below 1 million/ml and matched them by age and study period to a group of women with unexplained infertility. The latter group of women was considered as a case group (infertile subjects), while the former group of women was considered as a control group (reflecting the general female population). Women with fibroids could be included in both study groups; only those with submucosal lesions were excluded.

Main results and the role of chance: Fibroids were diagnosed in 31 women (16%) with unexplained infertility and in 32 women (16%) with severe male factor infertility. The adjusted odds ratio of carrying fibroids in women with unexplained infertility was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.52-1.58). Subgroup analyses according to number, dimension and location of fibroids failed to highlight an increased risk of infertility in any group.

Limitations reasons for caution: This is a retrospective study and some inaccuracies in fibroids detection cannot be ruled out. Moreover, the relatively small sample size hampers robust subgroup analyses. Even though we excluded women with patent causes of infertility, some women with specific causes of infertility could have been included among controls (yet are expected to account for <10% of the group).

Wider implications of the findings: This study suggests that small fibroids that do not encroach the endometrial cavity do not markedly affect female fertility. This information is clinically relevant when counseling infertile women with small fibroids and an otherwise unremarkable diagnostic work-up. Surgery may still be considered but only in selected cases.

Study funding/competing interests: This study was partially funded by Italian Ministry of Health: current research IRCCS. E.S. reports grants from Ferring, grants and personal fees from Merck, and grants and personal fees from Theramex outside the submitted work. All the other authors do not have any competing interest to declare.

Trial registration number: N/A.

Abstract Image

无症状的小肌瘤对女性生育能力的影响:一项病例对照研究。
研究问题:小而无症状的子宫壁内和浆膜下肌瘤会影响女性生育能力吗?概要回答:小而无症状的肌瘤不侵犯子宫内膜腔,似乎不明显影响女性生育能力。已知情况:关于子宫肌瘤和生育能力的现有证据有限。大多数信息是通过比较受子宫肌瘤影响的妇女和未受子宫肌瘤影响的妇女的成功而获得的。这些研究显示了粘膜下和可能的壁内肌瘤的有害影响。然而,这项研究设计只提供了胚胎植入的信息,而不是一般的女性生育能力。研究设计规模持续时间:回顾性观察性病例对照研究,对200名配偶诊断为严重男性不育症的女性和200名不明原因不育症的女性进行研究。如果原假设(肌瘤不影响生育)是有效的,人们会期望在两个研究组中有相似的肌瘤患病率。相反,如果子宫肌瘤确实影响生育能力,那么在不明原因不孕的女性中发病率会更高。该研究是在IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico基金会的不孕症部门进行的,为期5年,从2014年1月到2020年6月。参与者/材料设置方法:我们回顾性地招募了寻求怀孕的女性,其伴侣的精子浓度多次低于100万/ml,并根据年龄和研究期间将她们与一组原因不明的不孕症女性进行匹配。后一组妇女被视为病例组(不育受试者),而前一组妇女被视为对照组(反映一般女性人口)。患有肌瘤的女性可以被纳入两个研究组;仅排除粘膜下病变的患者。主要结果和偶然性的作用:31例(16%)不明原因不孕症患者诊断为肌瘤,32例(16%)严重男性因素不孕症患者诊断为肌瘤。不明原因不孕妇女携带肌瘤的校正优势比为0.91 (95% CI: 0.52-1.58)。根据子宫肌瘤的数量、大小和位置进行亚组分析,没有发现任何一组的不孕风险增加。局限性:这是一项回顾性研究,不能排除子宫肌瘤检测中的一些不准确性。此外,相对较小的样本量妨碍了稳健的亚组分析。尽管我们排除了有明显不孕原因的女性,但一些有特殊不孕原因的女性可能被包括在对照组中(但预计会解释研究结果的更广泛含义:这项研究表明,不侵犯子宫内膜腔的小肌瘤不会显著影响女性的生育能力。)这一信息在咨询患有小肌瘤的不孕妇女和其他不显著的诊断检查时具有临床相关性。手术仍可考虑,但仅限于选定的病例。研究经费/竞争利益:本研究部分由意大利卫生部资助:当前研究IRCCS。E.S.报告Ferring的资助,默克的资助和个人费用,以及Theramex在提交工作之外的资助和个人费用。所有其他作者没有任何竞争利益要申报。试验注册号:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信