Patient and Caregiver Perspectives on Telehealth Use in a Multidisciplinary Huntington's Disease Clinic: A Single-Institution Experience.

IF 2.1 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Diksha Mohanty, Philipp Schmitt, Laura Dixon, Victoria Holiday, Peter Hedera
{"title":"Patient and Caregiver Perspectives on Telehealth Use in a Multidisciplinary Huntington's Disease Clinic: A Single-Institution Experience.","authors":"Diksha Mohanty,&nbsp;Philipp Schmitt,&nbsp;Laura Dixon,&nbsp;Victoria Holiday,&nbsp;Peter Hedera","doi":"10.3233/JHD-220547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronavirus pandemic saw technology evolve as outpatient clinics faced restriction of in-person visits. Reliance on telemedicine using two-way audio-video communication significantly increased. Telemedicine was observed to be convenient, cost-effective, reduced no-show rates, and fostered sustained engagement. Enhanced flexibility from short notice scheduling benefitted patients and their caregivers. Greater time value was perceived by patients, and reduced reliance on caregivers. Disadvantages included barriers of access to internet connectivity or equipment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to retrospectively survey patients with Huntington's disease (HD) seen via telehealth in our HDSA Center for Excellence Multidisciplinary clinic. We evaluated usability, learnability, interface quality, reliability, and future use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative survey used the 21-item Telehealth Usability Questionnaire. Close-ended responses ranged from strongly disagree to strongly agree scored on Likert scale (1 through 7). Averages were calculated to examine attitudes towards telemedicine. Spearman correlation test was performed to detect attitude biases between patients and caregivers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents were more likely than not to strongly agree with survey statements. Average attitude score of 5.92 (range 2.95-7.00) suggested favorability and improved convenience when telehealth was used in complement to in-person visits, without detriment to patient-provider communication. Spearman correlation coefficient between patient and family/caregiver groups was 0.023, which is below the cutoff of 0.344 for a = 0.05 at N = 24. This suggests there was no bias between patient and caregiver attitudes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated telehealth is favored by caregivers and patients with HD. This population with specific physical, cognitive and psychiatric needs can benefit from adaptive systems that enhance compliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":16042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Huntington's disease","volume":"11 4","pages":"415-419"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Huntington's disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JHD-220547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus pandemic saw technology evolve as outpatient clinics faced restriction of in-person visits. Reliance on telemedicine using two-way audio-video communication significantly increased. Telemedicine was observed to be convenient, cost-effective, reduced no-show rates, and fostered sustained engagement. Enhanced flexibility from short notice scheduling benefitted patients and their caregivers. Greater time value was perceived by patients, and reduced reliance on caregivers. Disadvantages included barriers of access to internet connectivity or equipment.

Objective: We aimed to retrospectively survey patients with Huntington's disease (HD) seen via telehealth in our HDSA Center for Excellence Multidisciplinary clinic. We evaluated usability, learnability, interface quality, reliability, and future use.

Methods: This qualitative survey used the 21-item Telehealth Usability Questionnaire. Close-ended responses ranged from strongly disagree to strongly agree scored on Likert scale (1 through 7). Averages were calculated to examine attitudes towards telemedicine. Spearman correlation test was performed to detect attitude biases between patients and caregivers.

Results: Respondents were more likely than not to strongly agree with survey statements. Average attitude score of 5.92 (range 2.95-7.00) suggested favorability and improved convenience when telehealth was used in complement to in-person visits, without detriment to patient-provider communication. Spearman correlation coefficient between patient and family/caregiver groups was 0.023, which is below the cutoff of 0.344 for a = 0.05 at N = 24. This suggests there was no bias between patient and caregiver attitudes.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated telehealth is favored by caregivers and patients with HD. This population with specific physical, cognitive and psychiatric needs can benefit from adaptive systems that enhance compliance.

在多学科亨廷顿病诊所远程医疗使用的患者和护理人员的观点:单一机构的经验。
背景:冠状病毒大流行见证了技术的发展,门诊诊所面临着亲自就诊的限制。对使用双向视听通信的远程医疗的依赖显著增加。据观察,远程医疗方便,成本效益高,减少了缺勤率,并促进了持续的参与。短时间安排提高的灵活性使患者和他们的护理人员受益。患者感受到更大的时间价值,减少了对护理人员的依赖。缺点包括接入互联网连接或设备的障碍。目的:我们旨在回顾性调查在我们的亨廷顿舞蹈病卓越中心多学科诊所通过远程医疗就诊的亨廷顿舞蹈病患者。我们评估了可用性、易学性、界面质量、可靠性和未来使用情况。方法:采用21项远程医疗可用性问卷进行定性调查。封闭性回答的范围从非常不同意到非常同意在李克特量表上得分(1到7)。计算平均值以检查对远程医疗的态度。采用Spearman相关检验检测患者与护理人员的态度偏差。结果:受访者更有可能强烈同意调查陈述。平均态度得分为5.92(范围2.95-7.00),表明使用远程医疗作为面对面就诊的补充,有利于改善便利性,且不影响医患沟通。患者组与家属/照顾者组的Spearman相关系数为0.023,低于N = 24时a = 0.05的0.344截断值。这表明病人和照顾者的态度之间没有偏见。结论:本研究表明远程医疗受到HD患者和护理人员的青睐。具有特殊生理、认知和精神需求的人群可以从增强依从性的适应性系统中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信