Cluster analysis to identify patient profiles and substance use patterns among pregnant persons with opioid use disorder

Q1 Psychology
Elizabeth Charron , Ziji Yu , Brad Lundahl , John Silipigni , Akiko Okifuji , Adam J. Gordon , Jacob D. Baylis , Ashley White , Kristi Carlston , Walitta Abdullah , Benjamin Haaland , Elizabeth E. Krans , Marcela C. Smid , Gerald Cochran
{"title":"Cluster analysis to identify patient profiles and substance use patterns among pregnant persons with opioid use disorder","authors":"Elizabeth Charron ,&nbsp;Ziji Yu ,&nbsp;Brad Lundahl ,&nbsp;John Silipigni ,&nbsp;Akiko Okifuji ,&nbsp;Adam J. Gordon ,&nbsp;Jacob D. Baylis ,&nbsp;Ashley White ,&nbsp;Kristi Carlston ,&nbsp;Walitta Abdullah ,&nbsp;Benjamin Haaland ,&nbsp;Elizabeth E. Krans ,&nbsp;Marcela C. Smid ,&nbsp;Gerald Cochran","doi":"10.1016/j.abrep.2023.100484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study objective was to identify distinct profiles of pregnant persons with opioid use disorder (PP-OUD) using cluster analysis and examine difference in substance use patterns between profiles. We examined data from 104 PP-OUD ≤ 32 weeks of gestation who were recruited into a behavioral health clinical trial at two academic medical centers. We used Partitioning Around Medoids analysis to identify clusters and explored patterns of substance use and substance use treatment between clusters using bivariate statistical tests and regression methods. We identified two distinct clusters of participants, including ‘Group A’ (n = 68; 65.4 %) and ‘Group B’ (n = 36; 34.6 %). Group A had fewer members who were not employed (38 % vs 58 %) and incarcerated (3 % vs 8 %) compared to Group B. Group A compared with Group B included more members with: a history of overdose (72 % vs 50 %); anxiety (85 % vs 25 %); ≥moderate pain (76 % vs 22 %); ≥moderate depression (75 % vs 36 %); ≥moderate drug use severity (94 % vs 78 %); and, more days of cannabis (mean: 6.2 vs 2.3 days), stimulant (mean: 4.5 vs 1.3 days), and injection heroin (mean: 1.3 vs 0 days) use in the past 30 days (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05 for all comparisons). Clusters of PP-OUD differed with respect to sociodemographic characteristics, mental health conditions, and substance use patterns. More research is needed to confirm identified profiles and assess treatment outcomes associated with cluster membership.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38040,"journal":{"name":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0b/d7/main.PMC9950438.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853223000068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study objective was to identify distinct profiles of pregnant persons with opioid use disorder (PP-OUD) using cluster analysis and examine difference in substance use patterns between profiles. We examined data from 104 PP-OUD ≤ 32 weeks of gestation who were recruited into a behavioral health clinical trial at two academic medical centers. We used Partitioning Around Medoids analysis to identify clusters and explored patterns of substance use and substance use treatment between clusters using bivariate statistical tests and regression methods. We identified two distinct clusters of participants, including ‘Group A’ (n = 68; 65.4 %) and ‘Group B’ (n = 36; 34.6 %). Group A had fewer members who were not employed (38 % vs 58 %) and incarcerated (3 % vs 8 %) compared to Group B. Group A compared with Group B included more members with: a history of overdose (72 % vs 50 %); anxiety (85 % vs 25 %); ≥moderate pain (76 % vs 22 %); ≥moderate depression (75 % vs 36 %); ≥moderate drug use severity (94 % vs 78 %); and, more days of cannabis (mean: 6.2 vs 2.3 days), stimulant (mean: 4.5 vs 1.3 days), and injection heroin (mean: 1.3 vs 0 days) use in the past 30 days (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). Clusters of PP-OUD differed with respect to sociodemographic characteristics, mental health conditions, and substance use patterns. More research is needed to confirm identified profiles and assess treatment outcomes associated with cluster membership.

聚类分析以确定阿片类药物使用障碍孕妇的患者概况和物质使用模式
该研究的目的是使用聚类分析来确定患有阿片类药物使用障碍(PP-OUD)的孕妇的不同特征,并检查特征之间物质使用模式的差异。我们检查了104名妊娠期≤32周的PP-OUD患者的数据,这些患者被招募到两个学术医疗中心的行为健康临床试验中。我们使用围绕类药物的划分分析来识别聚类,并使用双变量统计检验和回归方法探索聚类之间的物质使用和物质使用治疗模式。我们确定了两组不同的参与者,包括“A组”(n=68;65.4%)和“B组”(n=36;34.6%)。与B组相比,A组没有工作(38%对58%)和被监禁(3%对8%)的成员更少;焦虑(85%对25%);≥中度疼痛(76%对22%);≥中度抑郁症(75%对36%);≥中度药物使用严重程度(94%对78%);以及,在过去30天内使用大麻(平均:6.2天vs 2.3天)、兴奋剂(平均:4.5天vs 1.3天)和注射海洛因(平均:1.3天vs 0天)的天数增加(所有比较均P<;0.05)。PP-OUD集群在社会人口统计学特征、心理健康状况和物质使用模式方面存在差异。需要更多的研究来确认已确定的特征,并评估与集群成员相关的治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Addictive Behaviors Reports
Addictive Behaviors Reports Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Addictive Behaviors Reports is an open-access and peer reviewed online-only journal offering an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research in addictive behaviors. The journal accepts submissions that are scientifically sound on all forms of addictive behavior (alcohol, drugs, gambling, Internet, nicotine and technology) with a primary focus on behavioral and psychosocial research. The emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. We are particularly interested in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research. Studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry as well as scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are also very much encouraged. We also welcome multimedia submissions that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信